U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

RSA-7-OB for FY-2025: Submission #20

Instructions

Submittal Instructions

Grantees of the Independent Living Services for Older Individuals who are Blind (OIB) program must complete and submit their annual RSA 7-OB Report online through RSA’s website (https://rsa.ed.gov).

To register with RSA’s MIS, go to https://rsa.ed.gov and click on Info for new users. The link provides instructions for obtaining an agency- specific username and password. Further instructions for completing and submitting the RSA 7-OB Report online are provided upon completion of the registration process.

OIB grantees submitting the RSA 7-OB Report online are not required to mail signed copies of the 7-OB Report to RSA. Grantees must submit the 7-OB report in the MIS with an authorized signature and date. The signed lobbying certification form must be submitted by mail, fax, or electronically with the authorized signature and date.

The RSA 7-OB Report must be submitted to RSA no later than 90 days after the end of the reported Federal fiscal year (FFY) (i.e., December 31).

PART I: FUNDING SOURCES AND EXPENDITURES IN SUPPORT OF THE OIB PROGRAM

NOTE: References to Title VII below are to Title VII of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended by Title IV of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.

  1. Funding Sources and Amounts in Support of the OIB Program for the Reported Federal Fiscal Year (FFY)

    1. Title VII-Chapter 2 Federal grant award for reported FFY – Enter the total amount of your Title VII-Chapter 2 grant award for the reported FFY. Amount must agree with 10d of the Federal Financial Report form (SF-425).
    2. Title VII-Chapter 2 carryover from previous FFY – Enter the amount of Title VII-Chapter 2 grant funds carried over from the previous FFY. Enter zero, if none.
    3. TOTAL Title VII-Chapter 2 funds – The sum of A1 + A2. Total will be automatically populated.
    4. Title VII-Chapter 1, Part B funds – Enter the total amount of Federal Title VII-Chapter 1, Part B (State Independent Living Services) funds made available for support of the OIB program in the reported FFY.
    5. Other Federal funds available for expenditure in the reported FFY - Enter the total amount of any other Federal funds available for expenditure to support the OIB program for the reported FFY. Other Federal funds may include, but are not limited to, such funds as SSA reimbursement, Title XX Social Security Act funds, and Older Americans Act funds, including the carryover of such funds that are available for expenditure in the reported FFY.
    6. Total Federal funds - Sum of A3 + A4 + A5. Total will be automatically populated.
    7. State funds (excluding in-kind contributions) - Enter the total amount of State funds available for expenditure in the OIB program. Include funds from State appropriations as well as funds from other State sources that were available to support the OIB program for the reported FFY.
    8. In-kind contributions - Enter the total dollar amount of fairly evaluated and documented in-kind contributions from state, local, and public agencies, as well as non-profit and for-profit organizations. These can include but are not limited to services, materials, equipment, buildings, or office space that was utilized in support of the OIB program.
    9. Other non-Federal funds - Enter the total amount of funds from other non-Federal sources including local and community funding, non-profit or for-profit agency funding, voluntary client contributions, etc. Do not include in-kind contributions. State funds should be reported in A7 above.
    10. Total non-Federal funds - Sum of A7 + A9 above; do not include In- kind contributions reported in A8. Total will be automatically populated.
    11. Total of all funds available for expenditure in the reported FFY - Sum of A6 + A7 + A9. Do not include in-kind contributions reported in A8. Total will be automatically populated.

  2. OIB Program Expenditures in Reported FFY

In this section, report allowable expenditures made in support of the OIB program in the reported FFY. For the purpose of this data collection, the term ”expenditures” means charges made by a non- Federal entity to the Federal OIB award (2 C.F.R. § 200.34).

In this data collection, expenditures are to be reported under two categories, (1) administrative costs, and (2) direct service costs. Within these categories, funds expended from the Title VII-Chapter 2 Federal OIB grant award and from non-Federal funds used to meet the match requirement in accordance with 34 C.F.R. § 367.31(b) and

§ 367.61 are reported separately from allowable OIB expenditures made from other Federal and non-Federal sources. However, OIB grantees remain responsible for tracking specific information related to the expenditure of OIB funds from each source. For example, specific information on expenditures made from the OIB Federal award and from non-Federal sources used in meeting the match requirement must be reported on the SF-425.

  1. Funds expended for administrative costs in the reported FFY - Enter the total amount of funds expended for administrative costs, including administrative support staff and general overhead costs, during the reported FFY. Do not include expenditures for direct services provided by agency staff or the expenditures of contract or sub-grantee staff that provide direct services under contracts or sub-grants. For example, if an administrator spends a portion of his or her time providing administrative services and the remainder providing direct services, include only the expenditures for administrative services.
    1. Administrative expenditures from (1) Title VII-Chapter 2 Federal grant award funds, including allowable carryover funds from the previous FFY and (2) non-Federal sources used in meeting the match requirement as reported on line 10j of the SF-425.
    2. Administrative expenditures from all other allowable sources as identified in Part I - A above.
    3. Total administrative expenditures - Sum of 1a + 1b. Total will be automatically populated.
  2. Funds expended for direct services during the reported FFY - Enter the total funds expended for direct program services during the reported FFY. Amount reported must equal the total funds expended for services in Part IV – F.
    1. Direct service expenditures from (1) Title VII-Chapter 2 OIB Federal grant award, including allowable carryover funds from the previous FFY and (2) non-Federal sources used in meeting the match requirement as reported on line 10j of the SF-425.
    2. Direct service expenditures from all other allowable sources as identified in Part I - A above.
    3. Total direct services expenditures - Sum of 2a + 2b. Total will be automatically populated.
  3. Total funds expended for the program during the reported FFY - Sum of B1c + B2c. Total will be automatically populated.

Part II: Program Staffing

Base all full-time equivalent (FTE) calculations on the number of hours per week considered full time for the position. Record all FTEs assigned to the OIB program during the reported FFY irrespective of whether salary is paid with Title VII-Chapter 2 funds. Report the number of hours per week that define FTE for State Agency staff and for Contract/Subgrant staff (e.g. 40 hours, 35 hours, etc.).

  1. Full-time Equivalent (FTE) Program Staff

    Record the FTE administrative and support staff and direct service staff, including State agency staff and contract/subgrant staff, for the OIB program. If a staff member provides both administrative and support functions and direct services, report the percentage of FTE devoted to administrative and support activities under “Administrative & Support” and the percentage of FTE devoted to direct services under “Direct Services.” For example, assuming a full-time 40 hour work week, if 20% (8 hours per week) of a staff person’s time was spent on administrative and support functions related to this program, and 80% (32 hours per week) of the staff person’s time was spent in providing direct services for this program, the reported FTE for that staff person would be 0.2 for administrative and support functions and 0.8 for direct services.

    1. FTE State Agency staff assigned to the OIB program
      1. Administrative and support – Under “Administrative & Support,” enter the FTE of all administrative and support staff (e.g., management, program directors, supervisors, readers, drivers for staff, etc.) assigned to the OIB program from the State agency.
      2. Direct service – Under “Direct Service”, enter the FTE of all State agency direct service staff (e.g., rehabilitation teachers, Independent Living (IL) specialists, orientation and mobility specialists, social workers, drivers for individuals receiving services, etc.) assigned to the OIB program from the State agency.
      3. Total – The total State agency FTE (A1C) is the sum of the “Administrative & Support” FTE (A1A) and “Direct Service” FTE (A1B). Total will be automatically populated.
    2. FTE through contract/subgrant – FTE assigned to the OIB program through a contract or subgrant.
      1. Administrative & support – Under “Administrative & Support” (A2a), enter the FTE of all administrative and support staff (e.g., management, program directors, supervisors, readers, drivers for staff, etc.) assigned to the OIB program through contract/subgrant.

      2. Direct service – Under “Direct Service” (A2b), enter the FTE of all direct service staff (e.g., rehabilitation teachers, independent living specialists, orientation and mobility specialists, social

        workers, drivers for individuals receiving services, etc.) assigned to the OIB program through contract/subgrant.

      3. Total – The Total Contract/subgrantee FTE (A2c) is the sum of the “Administrative & Support” FTE (A2a) and the “Direct Service” FTE (A2b). Total will be automatically populated.
    3. Total FTE – The system will generate the FTE totals for Administrative & Support and for Direct Service, as well as the total FTE for the program.

  2. Employees with Disabilities

    Record the number of employees with disabilities that are represented in the categories below. Individuals reported here should include both agency and contract/subgrant staff.

    1. Employees with disabilities other than with blindness or severe visual impairments – Enter the total number of employees with disabilities, excluding those with blindness or severe visual impairments. Employees with blindness or severe visual impairments are reported separately in B2 and B3 below.

    2. Employees with blindness or severe visual impairments who are age

      55 and older – Enter the total number who are blind or who have severe visual impairments and are age 55 and older.

    3. Employees with blindness or severe visual impairments who are under age 55 – Enter the total number who are blind or have a severe visual impairment and are under age 55.

    4. Total employees with disabilities – Enter the number of employees reported in B1, B2, and B3. Total in B4 will be automatically populated.

      Part III: Data on Individuals Served

      Provide data in each of the categories below on the number of individuals for whom one or more services were provided (program participants) during the reported FFY.

      1. Individuals Served

        1. Enter the number of program participants carried over from the previous FFY who received services in this reported FFY (i.e., an individual who received services in September (or any other month) of the previous FFY and continued to receive additional services in the reported FFY).
        2. Enter the number of program participants who began receiving services during the reported FFY irrespective of whether they have completed all services.
        3. Total individuals served during the reported FFY - Sum of A1 + A2. Total will be automatically populated.

      2. Age at Application

        Categories 1 through 4 - The total number of individuals served in each respective age category (B1 through B4).

    5. The sum of age categories B1 through B4. This total must agree with the total reported in A3. Total will be automatically populated.

  3. Gender

    1. Self-identifies as female – Enter the total number of individuals receiving services who self-identify as female.
    2. Self-identifies as male – Enter the total number of individuals receiving services who self-identify as male.
    3. Did not self-identify gender – Enter the total number of Individuals receiving services who did not self-identify gender.
    4. Total – Sum of C1 + C2 + C3. This total must agree with the total reported in A3 above. Total will be automatically populated.

  4. Race

    Categories 1 through 7 - Enter the number of individuals served in the reported FFY for each of the 7 race categories (D1 through D7). Self- identification is required to the greatest extent possible. It is generally expected that the information recorded will reflect the individual’s own identification of race from these categories.

    Observer identification is not required. If the individual refuses to self-identify, record in item 6 (individual did not self-identify race). An individual should only be reported in one of the 7 categories. Item 7 should be used to report individuals served who identify two or more races. The multi-race category (item 7) should not be used to report an individual who identifies only 1 of the 5 races listed and also identifies that they are of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Hispanic or Latino ethnicity is recorded in section E, regardless of race.

    1. American Indian – Enter the number of individuals served who are American Indian or Alaska Native. American Indian/Alaska Native means a person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.

    2. Asian – Enter the number of individuals served who are Asian. Asian means a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for

      example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.

    3. Black or African American – Enter the number of individuals served who are Black or African American. Black or African American means a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.
    4. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander – Enter the number of individuals served who are Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander means a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.
    5. White – Enter the number of individuals served who are White. White means a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
    6. Individual did not self-identify race – Enter the number of individuals served who did not self-identify race or refused to self- identify race.
    7. Two or more races – Enter the number of individuals served who report two or more races (for multi-race individuals).
    8. Total – Sum of items D1 through D7. This total must agree with the total reported in A3 above. Do not include the Ethnicity sum from E1. Total will be automatically populated.

  5. Ethnicity

    1. Enter the number of individuals served who reported that they are Hispanic or Latino. Hispanic or Latino means a person of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race.

  6. Degree of Visual Impairment

    1. Enter the number of individuals served who are totally blind (e.g., have light perception only or no light perception).
    2. Enter the number of individuals served who are considered legally blind, excluding those recorded in F1.
    3. Enter the number of individuals served who have severe visual impairment, excluding those recorded in F1 and F2.
    4. Total - Sum of F1 + F2 + F3. The total must agree with the total in A3 above. Total will be automatically populated.

  7. Major Cause of Visual Impairment

     

    Enter only one major cause of visual impairment for each individual served during the reported FFY. Below are the most common causes of visual impairment among older individuals.

    1. Macular degeneration – Enter the number of individuals served who have macular degeneration as the major cause of visual impairment. Macular degeneration is a progressive disease of the retina wherein the light-sensing cells in the central area of vision (the macula) stop working and eventually die.
    2. Diabetic retinopathy – Enter the number of individuals served who have diabetic retinopathy as the major cause of visual impairment. Diabetic retinopathy is damage to the blood vessels of the light- sensitive tissue at the back of the eye (retina) caused by diabetes.
    3. Glaucoma – Enter the number of individuals served who have glaucoma as the major cause of visual impairment. Glaucoma is a group of eye diseases causing optic nerve damage that involves mechanical compression or decreased blood flow.
    4. Cataracts – Enter the number of individuals served who have cataracts as the major cause of visual impairment. A cataract is a clouding of the natural lens of the eye resulting in blurred vision, sensitivity to light and glare, distortion, and dimming of colors.
    5. Other cause of visual impairment – Enter the number of individuals served whose major cause of visual impairment is not listed above.
    6. Total - Sum of G1 through G5. This total must agree with the total in A3 above. Total will be automatically populated.

  8. Other Age-Related Impairments

    Older individuals who are blind may have one or more other age-related impairments or disorders that impact their ability to carry out customary daily life activities in the home and community. Listed below are age-related impairments (other than visual impairments) that are common among older individuals. Enter the total number of individuals served in each of the categories listed in H1 through H-6. Individuals may report one or more non-visual impairments/conditions.

    1. Hearing impairment – Hearing impairment occurs when there is a problem with or damage to one or more parts of the ear, and may be a conductive hearing loss (outer or middle ear) or a sensorineural hearing loss (inner ear) or a combination. Presbycusis is the gradual hearing loss that occurs with aging.
    2. Mobility impairment – Older individuals may have difficulty with gross motor behavior, such as moving around in the environment, or with fine motor skills, such as writing. Conditions such as Osteoporosis (loss of mass and quality of bones), osteoarthritis (inflammation and deterioration of joints), and sarcopenia (age- related loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength) may contribute to frailty and injury in older individuals. Other conditions that contribute to loss of mobility and independence include disorders in the central nervous system that control movement such as in Parkinson’s disease.
    3. Communication impairment – Older individuals may have impairments in expressive communication, receptive communication, or both, as a result of stroke, dementia, or other conditions.
    4. Cognitive or intellectual impairment – Cognitive impairments, such as dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, impact parts of the brain that control thought, memory, and executive functioning. Individuals with intellectual disabilities (e.g., Down syndrome), should also be included in this category.
    5. Mental health impairment – Older individuals may have impairments or disorders that affect their mental health such as: Mood disorders (e.g., depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and seasonal affective disorder); Sundown syndrome, which affects individuals with dementia or Alzheimer’s; and psychosis or a personality disorder.
    6. Other impairment – Enter other impairments not captured in H1 – H5 above.

  9. Type of Residence

    1. Private residence – Enter the number of individuals served who live in a private residence (house or apartment).
    2. Senior independent living facility – Enter the number of individuals served who live in senior independent living housing in which minimal support is provided.
    3. Assisted living facility – Enter the number of individuals served who live in assisted living facilities (e.g., housing that provides personal care and services which meet needs beyond basic provision of food, shelter and laundry).
    4. Nursing home/long-term care facility – Enter the number of individuals served who live in nursing homes/long-term care facilities (e.g., any facility that provides care to one or more persons who require nursing care and related medical services of such complexity to require professional nursing care under the direction of a physician on a 24 hour a day basis).
    5. Homeless – Enter the number of individuals served who are homeless.
    6. Total – Sum of I1 through I5. This total must agree with the total in A3 above. Total will be automatically populated.

J. Source of Referral

  1. Eye care provider – Enter the number of individuals served referred by an eye care provider (e.g., ophthalmologist or optometrist).
  2. Physician/medical provider – Enter the number of individuals served referred by a medical provider other than an eye care provider.
  3. State VR agency – Enter the number of individuals served referred by a State vocational rehabilitation (VR) agency.
  4. Government/public or private social services agency – Enter the number of individuals served referred by a government/public or private social services agency, not listed elsewhere, that provides assistance to consumers related to eligibility and securing entitlements and benefits, counseling, elder law services, or assistance with housing.
  5. Veterans Administration – Enter the number of individuals served referred by the Veterans Administration.
  6. Senior program – Enter the number of individuals served referred by a senior program defined as a community-based educational recreational, or socialization program operated by a senior center, nutrition site, or senior club.
  7. Assisted living facility – Enter the number of individuals served referred by an assisted living facility defined as housing that provides personal care and services which meet needs beyond basic provision of food, shelter and laundry.
  8. Nursing home/long-term care facility – Enter the number of individuals served referred by a nursing home/long-term care facility defined as any facility that provides care to one or more persons who require nursing care and related medical services of such complexity to require professional nursing care under the direction of a physician on a 24 hour a day basis.
  9. Independent living center – Enter the number of individuals served referred by an independent living center (ILC) defined as a consumer- controlled, community-based, cross-disability, nonresidential private nonprofit agency that is designed and operated within a local community by individuals with disabilities, and provides an array of independent living services.
  10. Family member or friend – Enter the number of individuals referred by a family member or friend.
  11. Self-referral – Enter the number of individuals who were self- referred.
  12. All other sources – Enter the number of individuals referred from All other sources aside from those listed above, including Faith based organizations.
  13. Total – The sum of J1 through J12. This total must agree with the total in A3 above. Total will be automatically populated.

Part IV: Types of Services Provided and Funds Expended

Provide data related to the number of program participants receiving each type of service and funds expended for each type of service.

Total expenditures for direct program services in Part I - B2 must equal the total funds spent on services in Part IV - F. In other words, the amount reported in Part I - B2 must equal the sum of the expenditures reported in Part IV - F. Salary or expenditures associated with direct service staff or contractors providing direct services should be included in the expenditure of services provided in A1, B1, C1, D1 and E1.

  1. Clinical/Functional Vision Assessments and Services

     

    1. Total expenditures from all sources of program funding - Enter the total expenditures, including expenditures from Title VII-Chapter 2 Federal grant funds and all other sources of program funding, for clinical and/or functional vision assessments and services, whether purchased or provided directly.
    2. Persons served – Vision Screening/Vision Examination/Low Vision Evaluation (unduplicated count): Enter the total number of individuals who received clinical vision screening or vision examinations from qualified or certified professionals such as ophthalmologists, optometrists, or low vision specialists (i.e., one individual may receive multiple services during the reported FFY but should only be counted one time). Assessment areas may include functional visual acuity and fields, efficiency of vision in the performance of everyday tasks, and evaluation for low vision aids or equipment. Functional vision assessments are typically provided by professionals who are certified or have a master’s degree in low vision rehabilitation. Do not include evaluations for orientation and mobility, which should be included in IV - C3.
    3. Persons served – Surgical or therapeutic treatments to prevent, correct, or modify disabling eye conditions (unduplicated count): Enter the total number of individuals who received surgical or therapeutic treatment to prevent, correct, or modify disabling eye conditions, including prescription optical devices(i.e., one individual may receive multiple services during the reported FFY but should only be counted one time). Nonprescription optical aids and devices should be reported in IV - B2.

  2. Assistive Technology devices and services

    As defined in Section 3(4) of the Assistive Technology Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-364), “assistive technology device means any item, piece of equipment, or product system whether acquired commercially, modified, or customized that is used to increase, maintain, or improve functional capabilities of individuals with disabilities.” Assistive

    technology devices may include such items as canes, slates, insulin gauges, closed circuit televisions, computers, adaptive software, magnifiers, adaptive cooking items, adaptive recreational items, handwriting guides, braille devices, large button telephones, etc. Assistive technology services may include the evaluation of assistive technology needs of an individual, services related to acquisition of technology, loan programs, maintenance and repair of assistive technology, training or technical assistance for the individual or professionals related to the use of assistive technology, programs to expand the availability of assistive technology, low vision services related to the use of optical aids and devices, and other services related to the selection, acquisition, or use of an assistive technology device.

    1. Total expenditures from all sources of program funding – Enter the total amount of expenditures, including expenditures from Title VII- Chapter 2 Federal grant funds and all other sources of program funds, for the provision of assistive technology devices and services.
    2. Persons served – Provision of assistive technology devices and/or services (unduplicated count): Enter the unduplicated count of individuals who received one or more assistive technology devices and services (i.e., one individual may receive multiple assistive technology devices and services during the reported FFY but should only be counted one time).

  3. Independent Living and Adjustment Training Services

    1. Total expenditures from all sources of program funding - Enter the total expenditures, including expenditures from Title VII-Chapter 2 Federal grant funds and all other sources of program funding, for the provision of services and adjustment training leading to independent living. Evaluation and assessment services (excluding those included in IV - A2 or IV - B2) leading to the planning and implementation of services and training should be included in these costs.
    2. Persons served – Independent living and adjustment training services (unduplicated count): Enter the unduplicated count of individuals who received one or more independent living and adjustment training services (i.e., one individual may receive multiple independent living and adjustment training services during the reported FFY but should only be counted one time).
    3. Number of persons reported in IV - C2 who received the following services:
      1. Persons served – Orientation and mobility training: Enter the total number of individuals who received orientation and mobility (O & M) services or travel training (i.e., learning to access public or private transportation and to travel safely and as independently as possible in the home and community with or without the use of mobility aids and devices).
      2. Persons served – Communication skills training: Enter the total number of individuals who received communication skills training. This category includes, for example, training in reading and writing braille; training in the use of the telephone (including mobile phones); training in the use of readers, newspaper reading services, radio and talking book services; and training in other communication skills and technologies. This category also includes training in keyboarding and computer literacy. Training in the use of specialized computer software (e.g., screen reading software) and adaptive equipment should be reported under assistive technology services (IV - B2 above).
      3. Persons served – Daily living skills training: Enter the total number of individuals who received daily living skills training. This category includes, for example, training in the use of blindness and low vision alternative techniques for telling time, food preparation, grooming and dress, household chores, medical management, shopping, and recreational activities.
      4. Persons served – Advocacy training: Enter the total number of individuals who participated in advocacy training including consumer organization meetings.
      5. Persons served – Adjustment counseling and/or peer support services: Enter the total number of individuals who received adjustment counseling and/or peer support services (individual or group) to assist them in adjusting to visual impairment and blindness.
      6. Persons served – Information and referral services: Enter the total number of individuals (program participants) who received information and referral to other service providers, programs, and agencies (e.g., senior programs, public and private social service programs, faith-based organizations, consumer groups, etc.) to enhance adjustment, independent living, and integration into the community. Do not include individuals who received only information and referral and for whom no other services were provided (e.g., non-participants, the general public, and other service providers).
      7. Persons served – Other independent living services: Enter the total number of individuals who received any other independent living service not listed above.

  4. Supportive Services

    Supportive services are services provided to individuals with disabilities so that they can access other program services. Under

    this category, report the number of individuals who received reader services, transportation, personal attendant services, interpreters, or other support services while actively participating in the program or attaining independent living goals.

    1. Expenditures – Enter the total expenditures, including expenditures from Title VII-Chapter 2 Federal grant funds and all other sources of program funding, for the provision of supportive services.
    2. Persons served – supportive services (unduplicated count): Enter the unduplicated count of individuals who received supportive services as described above (i.e., one individual may receive multiple supportive services during the reported FFY but should only be counted one time).

  5. Community Awareness Activities and Information and Referral

    1. Expenditures – Enter the total expenditures, including expenditures from Title VII-Chapter 2 Federal grant funds and all other sources of program funding, used to support community awareness activities/events and providing information and referral services to individuals for whom this was the only service provided (e.g., health fair for seniors, training for other professionals, telephone inquiries, and general inquiries about services for older individuals who are blind).

  6. TOTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES

Sum of A1 through E1. The total must agree with the direct service expenditures reported in Part 1 - B2c.

Part V: Program Performance Measures and Outcome Data

The revised GPRA measures for the OIB program are listed below. Grantees must report the data necessary to calculate program performance on these measures as outlined in the instructions below following the list of measures.

Program Measures

Objective: To restore, improve, or maintain the independence of older individuals whose functional capabilities have been lost or diminished as a result of vision loss or blindness.

  1. Assistive Technology Devices and Services

    Measure A – The percentage of individuals receiving assistive technology devices and services who demonstrated improvement in one or more functional capabilities during the reported FFY consistent with the objectives for receiving such devices and services.

  2. Independent Living and Adjustment Training Services

    Measure B - The percentage of individuals receiving one or more independent living and adjustment training services who demonstrated improvement in functional capabilities during the reported FFY.

  3. Independence in the Home and Community

    Measure C1 – The percentage of individuals completing a plan of services who reported feeling more confident in their ability to maintain their current living situation.

    Measure C2 - The percentage of individuals completing a plan of services who reported an increased ability to engage in their customary daily life activities in the home and community.

  4. Efficiency Measure – (Measure will be calculated by RSA using MIS data reported in PARTS I and III)

Objective: To provide cost effective supports and services to increase the independence of older individuals who are blind so that they may remain in the community and to prevent or delay the need for an increasing level of care, particularly for those individuals who are at risk of entering institutions.

Measure D – The average annual cost per individual served through the program during the reported FFY.

Instructions for Reporting of Performance Data in Part V:

For measures A, Assistive Technology Devices and Services, and B, Independent Living and Adjustment Training Services, data is reported for individuals whose change in functional capabilities was assessed during the reported FFY, following the receipt of one or more services provided through the program.

For measures under C, Independence in the Home and Community, data is reported for individuals completing a plan of services during the reported FFY. For the purpose of this measure, “a plan of services is a set of services provided through the OIB program designed to meet an individual’s goals.” For the purpose of the items reported under C, an individual who has completed his or her plan of services does not need to have formally exited the program.

Grantees are not required to report data for efficiency measure D in Part V. The average annual cost per individual served through the program during the reported FFY will be calculated by RSA based on data reported in Part I, B3 and Part III, A3.

  1. Assistive Technology Devices and Services

    1. From the unduplicated number of persons served that received assistive technology devices and services reported in IV - B2, enter the number of unduplicated individuals receiving assistive technology

      devices and services for whom change in functional capabilities was assessed, during the reported FFY (Denominator).

    2. From the unduplicated number of persons reported in A1 above, enter the unduplicated number of individuals receiving assistive technology devices and services who demonstrated improvement in one or more functional capabilities, during the reported FFY. Note: An individual who maintained but did not improve their capabilities may be reported here if the individual’s goal was to prevent further decline in their capabilities (Numerator).
    3. The percentage of individuals receiving assistive technology devices and services who demonstrated improvement in one or more functional capabilities during the reported FFY consistent with the objectives for receiving such devices and services. (A2 divided by A1 X 100). The percentage is calculated by RSA MIS.

  2. Independent Living and Adjustment Training Services

    1. From the unduplicated number of individuals receiving independent living and adjustment training services reported in IV C2, during the reported FFY, enter the unduplicated number of individuals receiving independent living and adjustment training services for whom change in functional capabilities was assessed during the reported FFY (Denominator).
    2. From the unduplicated number of persons reported in B1 above, enter the unduplicated number of individuals receiving independent living and adjustment training services who demonstrated improvement in one or more functional capabilities. Note: An individual who maintained but did not improve their capabilities may be reported here if the individual’s goal was to prevent further decline in their capabilities (Numerator).
    3. The percentage of individuals receiving one or more independent living and adjustment training services who demonstrated improvement in functional capabilities during the reported FFY (B2 divided by B1 X 100). The percentage is calculated by RSA MIS.

  3. Independence in the Home and Community

    Responses to items C1 through C5 below are based on individuals who completed their plan of services during the reported FFY. Note: For the purpose of these measures, an individual who has completed his or her plan of services does not need to have formally exited the program. For example, an individual who has completed individualized services but continues to participate in ongoing peer support activities provided through the program would be included.

    1. Total: Enter the total number of individuals completing a plan of services during the reported FFY (Denominator). Note: This means a specific set of services designed for the individual to meet his or her goals.
    2. Engage in customary daily life activities: Enter the number of individuals completing a plan of services during the reported FFY who reported an increased ability to engage in their customary daily life activities in the home and community (Numerator).
    3. The percentage of individuals completing a plan of services who reported an increased ability to engage in their customary daily life activities in the home and community. (C2 divided by C1 X 100). The percentage is calculated by RSA MIS.
    4. Maintain Living Situation – Enter the number of individuals completing a plan of services during the reported FFY who reported feeling that they are more confident in their ability to maintain their current living situation (Numerator).
    5. The percentage of individuals completing a plan of services who reported feeling that they are more confident in their ability to maintain their current living situation (C4 divided by C1 X 100). The percentage is calculated by RSA MIS.
  4. Efficiency Measure – (To be calculated by RSA MIS from data reported in PARTS I and III)
    1. Total funds expended for direct services provided during the reported FFY (as reported in I B2c)
    2. Number of individuals receiving services during the reported FFY (as reported in III A3)
    3. The average annual cost per individual served through the program during the reported period (D1 divided by D2).

Part VI: Training and Technical Assistance

On July 22, 2014, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) was enacted and included a new requirement under Section 751A that the RSA Commissioner shall conduct a survey of designated State agencies that receive grants under section 752 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by Title IV of WIOA, regarding training and technical assistance needs in order to determine funding priorities for such training and technical assistance. Enter a brief description of your training and technical assistance needs related to the implementation and improvement of the performance of your OIB program (for example, financial management, reporting requirements on the 7-OB, program management, data analysis and program performance, law and applicable regulations, provision of services and service delivery, promising practices, resources and information, outreach, etc.).

Part VII: Narrative

See descriptions of items to be included in the narrative on the 7-OB form.

Part VIII: Signature Instructions

SIGN AND PRINT THE NAME, TITLE AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE OIB PROGRAM DIRECTOR.

The certifying official (either the Program Director or a designated officer) must have the legal authority to submit the form on behalf of the agency.

Part I: Funding Sources and Expenditures in Support of the OIB Program
A. Funding Sources and Amounts in Support of the OIB Program for the Reported Federal Fiscal Year (FFY)
492,277
128,907
621,184
0
100,000
721,184
9,564
0
96,437
106,001
827,185
B. OIB Program Expenditures in Reported FFY
1. Funds expended for administrative costs in the reported FFY
86,702
32,965
119666.75
2. Funds expended for direct services during the reported FFY
371,701
110,663
482,364
3. Total funds expended for the program during the reported FFY (B1c + B2c)
602,031
Part II: Program Staffing
A. Full-time Equivalent (FTE) Program Staff
FTE (full time equivalent) is the number of hours per week considered full time for the positions reported below.
Please report the number of hours per week that define FTE for: (e.g., 40 hours, 35 hours, etc.).
40
40
0.09
0.00
0.0900
4.18
7.83
12.0100
4.2700
7.8300
12.1000
B. Employees with Disabilities
15
5
2
22
Part III: Data on Individuals Served
Provide data in each of the categories below on the number of individuals for whom one or more services were provided (program participants) during the reported FFY.
A. Individuals Served
439
430
869
B. Age at Application
77
188
375
229
869
C. Gender
576
236
57
869
D. Race
6
17
59
1
738
45
3
869
E. Ethnicity
130
F. Degree of Visual Impairment
49
293
527
869
G. Major Cause of Visual Impairment
498
94
106
39
132
869
H. Other Age-Related Impairments
267
213
41
66
100
424
I. Type of Residence
496
252
71
40
10
869
J. Source of Referral
294
49
9
47
12
36
20
16
66
148
91
81
869
Part IV: Types of Services Provided and Funds Expended
Provide data related to the number of older individuals who are blind receiving each type of service and funds expended for each type of service.
A. Clinical/Functional Vision Assessments and Services
69,494.00
309
0
B. Assistive Technology Devices and Services
163,063.00
494
C. Independent Living and Adjustment Training Services
209,042.00
732
3. Number of persons receiving the following services:
65
538
655
298
438
733
93
D. Supportive Services
2,541.00
325
E. Community Awareness Activities and Information and Referral
38,224.00
F. TOTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES
482364.00
Part V: Program Performance Measures and Outcome Data

Program Measures

Objective: To restore, improve, or maintain the independence of older individuals whose functional capabilities have been lost or diminished as a result of vision loss or blindness.
A. Assistive Technology Devices and Services
Measure A: The percentage of individuals receiving assistive technology devices and services who demonstrated improvement in one or more functional capabilities during the reported FFY consistent with the objectives for receiving such devices and services.
B. Independent Living and Adjustment Training Services
Measure B: The percentage of individuals receiving one or more independent living and adjustment training services who demonstrated improvement in functional capabilities during the reported FFY.
C. Independence in the Home and Community
Measure C1: The percentage of individuals completing a plan of services who reported feeling that they are more confident in their ability to maintain their current living situation. Measure C2: The percentage of individuals completing a plan of services who reported an increased ability to engage in their customary daily life activities in the home and community.
D. Efficiency Measure
Objective: To provide cost effective supports and services to increase the independence of older individuals who are blind so that they may remain in the community and to prevent or delay the need for an increasing level of care, particularly for those individuals who are at risk of entering institutions.
Measure: The average annual cost per individual served through the program during the reported FFY.
Provide the following data for each of the performance measures below. This will assist RSA in reporting results and outcomes related to the program.

Program Performance Data

A. Assistive Technology Devices and Services
406
304
75
B. Independent Living and Adjustment Training Services
376
321
85
C. Independence in the Home and Community
499
430
86
412
82.57
D. Efficiency Measure
482,364.00
869
555.08
Part VI: Training and Technical Assistance Needs
1. CCB: We appreciate the work of the Technical Assistance Center. We would like to receive more training on: working with individuals who have memory loss, assisting family members in their own adjustment, and working with OIB students who have various physical disabilities. We can always benefit from learning the best ways to track all statistics that are needed for reporting. Discussion on various survey tools would also be of benefit. We are experts at teaching individuals how to use an iPhone but struggle with teaching on Android devices as they all vary.

2. CTSR: It would be very helpful if in an ongoing basis (possibly at the bi-monthly OIB training or at a possible annual convention) the manufacturers of these assistive technology devices could be made available to demonstrate the most effective means of using the devices and how to best train someone (fitting the OIB demographics) to use these devices effectively.

3. CFI: CFI would benefit from additional training and technical assistance to: support/improve coordination between the State and the Independent Living Centers, enhance the use of DVR services for blind and low-vision consumers, and expand staff knowledge in areas such as assistive technology instruction and service navigation. Training that supports equitable outreach to underserved communities, including rural and minority populations, would also strengthen statewide service delivery. Tailored technical assistance in these areas would significantly improve the implementation and overall performance of the OIB program, leading to better outcomes for older individuals who are blind.

4. CPWD: Currently does not have any requests for training or technical assistance.

5. Ensight: Ensight would benefit from additional training and technical assistance focused on enhancing program efficiency, outreach, and documentation under the OIB program. Specifically:
-Continuing Education for Staff: Ongoing training in adaptive technology, accessibility tools, and techniques for serving individuals with combined sensory or cognitive impairments (such as low vision and dementia) would strengthen service delivery.
-Program Evaluation and Data Management: Technical assistance in refining data collection and reporting systems would help ensure consistent tracking of consumer outcomes and better demonstrate program impact.
-Community Outreach Strategies: Guidance on effective outreach to underserved rural areas and collaboration models with local healthcare providers, senior centers, and home health agencies (such as Almost Family Home Health) would increase consumer engagement.
-Peer and Volunteer Training Resources: Support developing structured peer mentorship or volunteer-led outreach programs would expand Ensight’s capacity and reduce isolation among older adults with vision loss.
-Access to training and consultation from OIB-TAC on these areas would enhance Ensight’s ability to deliver high-quality, equitable, and person-centered vision rehabilitation services across Colorado.
Part VII: Narrative
State Agency: Colorado contracts OIB services out to five subrecipients across the state: Colorado Center for the Blind (CCB), Center Toward Self Reliance (CTSR), Center for Independence (CFI), Center for People with Disabilities (CPWD), and Ensight Skills Center. Listed below is a summary of each of the five subrecipients’ implementation of the OIB program.

1. CCB: Various service delivery models are implemented in order to meet the needs of our students. CCB staff provides services to OIB individuals at the Center in the Denver Metro area and beyond; in-home services are provided, in-person support groups are conducted weekly, and two virtual support groups are provided weekly. We offer in-person support groups in the community on a monthly basis. Our Taking Charge Program provides intensive training for one week and is set up to especially serve individuals who are unserved and underserved living in more rural areas of Colorado. The two instructors who provide direct services to OIB students at the Colorado Center for the Blind are certified rehabilitation teachers. We do not contract with any outside individuals or agencies.

2. CTSR: The agency provided services and supports generally in face-face contacts within the community. All of these services are provided through agency staff (there are no sub-contractors for grant services). These contacts included (during this fiscal year) 8 different monthly support groups, most of which are community-based (with only one being held at the agency offices). There are additionally a large number of in-home contacts that are made that focus on one-one service delivery, whether assistive technology, supportive service delivery (installation of handrails and/or grab bars) and provision of durable medical equipment. The design of this program is to ensure that the individual for whom services and supports are provided do not move into a more restrictive environment.

3. CFI: CFI implements the OIB program primarily through in-house service delivery, with support from strategic partners to enhance statewide reach. Three part-time OIB staff provide services across CFI’s 12-county Western Slope region, allowing for direct service delivery, community outreach, and engagement with underserved and unserved older adults experiencing vision loss.

Services are provided through a combination of office appointments, remote service options, and home visits. The Grand Junction office houses a Low Vision Demonstration Lab and an Assistive Technology Loan Program, offering access to low-vision aids and devices, including electronic video magnifiers, for consumers who cannot afford them. Peer support continues to be a central program component. The Western Slope Visionaries (WSV) group meets monthly and provides education, peer mentorship, and demonstrations of low-vision tools. Two small, specialized support groups—Low Vision Navigators and Low Vision Pioneers—offer space for adjustment support and the exploration of new adaptive strategies and technologies. These groups are held on different days to reduce transportation and scheduling barriers for seniors relying on caregivers.

Individualized instruction is offered to help consumers maintain independence and increase confidence in daily living, including assistive technology training, use of accessibility features, and home-based environmental adaptations. The addition of a staff member with lived experience of later-life vision loss enhanced the availability of personalized peer mentoring. Intergenerational programming also continues through the Young Visionaries group, expanding understanding of vision loss across age ranges.

CFI regards all OIB consumers in FFY 2025 as underserved due to the scarcity of low-vision resources across the Western Slope. To increase access to services and resources, CFI maintains partnerships with the Audio Information Network of Colorado, Colorado Talking Book Library, ADRC, AAA, PACE, and initiated a new collaboration with Colorado Lions West District 6, which has provided financial assistance for prescription eyeglasses and equipment repair, as well as increased community outreach. CFI also collaborates with the Ensight Skills Center and the Colorado Center for the Blind to provide low vision evaluations and specialized services. Due to increased referrals, Ensight expanded its Western Slope visits from three to four this year, with planning occurring within the reporting period.

Remote services via phone and Zoom remain available for consumers living in rural or frontier areas, and travel assistance is provided for those needing support to attend appointments and assessments. The combination of in-house service delivery, community outreach, and targeted collaborations supports meaningful access to OIB services and expands service reach to older adults with vision loss across the Western Slope.

4. CPWD: CPWD’s Beyond Vision Program manages the OIB program across several Colorado counties, including Boulder County and the North Metro area; Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Broomfield, Clear Creek, Denver, Jefferson, Gilpin, & Weld. The program follows a “meet consumers where they are” approach, meaning staff provide services in the way that works best for each individual, depending on their current needs and capacities. Support is offered in-person at the three offices (Boulder, Longmont and Thornton), in consumers’ homes or communities, and remotely through Google Meet or phone. This increases access to services for individuals living in rural or hard-to-reach areas by reducing the need to travel.

In addition, we increase accessibility by offering a variety of service delivery methods. Beyond Vision offers virtual, hybrid, and in-person peer support groups across our nine-county region. The topics in these groups are guided by participants’ independent living goals. We also provide access options for individual services, such as assistive technology training, independent living skills training, communication training, and information and referral.

Services are provided by both internal staff and contracted vendors. Staff lead core activities such as skills training, peer support facilitation, and technology training. Vendors are brought in as needed to offer specialized services like orientation and mobility training or mental health counseling. There are no sub-grantees for this program. CPWD serves as the primary provider, ensuring all program goals are met.

5. Ensight: The OIB program in Colorado is delivered through a sub-grant model, with Ensight Skills Center serving as a sub-grantee. Services are provided through a combination of in-office appointments and in-home or community-based visits, ensuring consumers throughout Larimer and surrounding counties can access support regardless of location or mobility. Ensight utilizes both internal staff and contracted specialists to provide low vision evaluations, adaptive skills training, assistive technology instruction, and adjustment counseling.
1. CCB: Reporting information indicates that all individuals who were served learned new skills and gained independence as a result of services that were provided. This year we conducted verbal surveys, asking individuals if they had learned new information and if they were satisfied with the training and support that they received. Almost everyone reported that they were grateful for the services they received. In the upcoming year, we will use a new survey tool to collect more in depth information. Monthly reports indicate that our services are helpful and that our students are building their skills.

2. CTSR: The agency provides at least two opportunities each year for the consumers to evaluate the success (or lack thereof) of the services and supports which are provided by the agency. Throughout the year the consumers are given the opportunity to participate in a consumer satisfaction survey that renders an overall impression of the agency’s services and supports.

In the late summer and early fall when the agency worker updates the consumer’s independent living plan, the consumer is also given the opportunity to participate in the Independent Living and Adjustment Training Service Survey, which more decidedly focuses on the services specific to the OIB program.
During this reporting period all of the consumers were given the opportunity to participate in the survey and 81% of them participated.
There were 48 or approximately 64% of all consumers who indicated that they had improvement in daily life skills. 73% felt that they were better able to interact appropriately in their community and/or at their residence and more than 60% felt more confident in their ability to maintain themselves in their current living situation.

3. CFI: For the OIB program almost half of the consumers responded to the survey.
Number surveyed people surveyed: 34
Increased ability to engage in their customary daily life activities in the home and community
Choice of answers with results:
1) Less control/more confidence in ability: 0
2) Greater control/more confidence in ability: 31
3) No Change in control or confidence in ability: 3

4. CPWD: In FFY 2025, 124 consumer satisfaction surveys were returned, representing a 29% response rate from 486 surveys distributed between April and May 2025. An increase in response of more than double from FFY 2024. Most respondents reported a positive experience with the services provided by CPWD. Key findings from the survey include:
-93% of respondents felt they were in control of the goals included in their Independent Living Plan (ILP)​.
-86% agreed that it was easy to access services.
-99% would recommend CPWD to others.
-91% felt that working with the program helped them become more independent.

A recurring theme in the survey responses was the appreciation for increased independence and the support provided in navigating daily challenges, including the use of assistive technology/independent living training and peer support groups.

5. Ensight: Based on our annual consumer satisfaction survey (in which there were 106 respondents) some key themes:
-95.40% felt that the adaptive equipment they received met their needs.
-84.21% use the equipment daily
-28% have had a change of vision since discharge
-98.1% would recommend the services and programs at Ensight.
-75% were referred by their primary eye care provider
-90% feel that their work with Ensight has allowed them to maintain or improve their independence
-79% rated the program as excellent and 17% rated the program as good

Comments from consumers included:
-“I feel so grateful for all the advice, information and support. Thank you.”
-“Repeat Patient Good meeting. Lots of help for me.”
-“Staff was so helpful and encouraging”
-“Cori was amazing with me during our home visit. She gently suggested that I needed much better lighting, and I have used all of her suggestions. I'm still looking for the perfect makeup mirror, as I do not do well with blue light and they all seem to have that. I can't imagine any improvement, as your service are top notch.”
1. CCB: Success stories submitted by OIB Instructor: This year, we had the privilege of working with a senior who had recently begun experiencing vision loss. She first connected with our program by attending our weekly support group where she met others navigating similar challenges. Through these conversations, she found encouragement, motivation, and a renewed belief in her ability to remain independent. She often shares how meaningful it is to gain information, resources, and emotional support from peers who truly understand her experience. As her confidence grew, she chose to participate in our weekly braille class. She is eager to learn practical skills such as labeling personal items, identifying buttons in elevators, and reading room signs in medical settings. She approaches this new skill with enthusiasm and determination, and her progress has been steady and impressive. In addition, she began receiving individualized training. We provided her with a white cane and instruction and safe, effective travel techniques. She learned proper cane positioning and grip, how to maintain an appropriate arc and pace, and how to walk in step. She also developed the ability to detect various textures and obstacles with the cane as well as how to safely navigate stairs. Currently, she is working one-on-one with our Older Blind instructors. She has explored different phone options and will continue receiving training to find the tools that best support her daily independence. Her involvement in our services has not only strengthened her skills but also her confidence in her ability to live independently. Inspired by the progress she has made, she recently decided to move from an assisted living facility to an independent living community, where she will be able to cook, clean, and manage her own home. We have also connected her with additional resources, including accessible transportation via Access-a-Ride, volunteer services, the Talking Book Library, and Hadley courses. We are also currently assisting her in applying for the iCanConnect program for additional services. She has become a valued and enthusiastic member of our community, and we are grateful to be part of her journey toward greater independence and self-confidence.

When this senior first enrolled in the Older Individuals Who Are Blind program, he expressed uncertainty about traveling safely on his own. Even short distances felt overwhelming. In fact, during our first lessons, he held onto my arm just to walk down the hallway to my office. His lack of confidence and unfamiliarity with nonvisual travel skills made independent movement feel out of reach. Over time, through steady instruction and practice, he began learning the foundational skills of white cane travel. We worked step by step—starting with basic cane techniques, then moving into navigating familiar indoor spaces, and eventually progressing to more complex outdoor routes. As his skills improved, so did his confidence. He learned how to locate and follow sidewalks, identify landmarks, find doorways, and cross streets safely and intentionally. Each success built momentum for the next. A pivotal moment came after a medical appointment. Instead of calling for a ride home as he would have in the past, he chose to locate the nearest bus stop and take the bus on his own. On the way, he even stopped at a store to pick up a few items—navigating the path, the environment, and the return trip independently. When he shared the story, he was visibly proud, and we together celebrated his victory. It represented a shift from hesitation to independence. In addition to cane skills, we spent meaningful time discussing his feelings about vision loss and exploring a positive philosophy of blindness. Through these conversations, he developed a stronger sense of self-determination and a belief in his own capability. We also worked on practical daily living strategies, including adding appointments to the calendar on his phone, retrieving stored information, and using tools such as a signature guide to sign his name independently. Today, he travels by himself regularly and enjoys the freedom that being mobile provides. He often talks about how much he looks forward to getting out and exploring—something he once thought he might never do again.

2. CTSR: Three examples of the results of the services and supports provided by the agency.
-Consumer #1 is 96 years old and loves watching her favorite football team (Denver Broncos). Through the provision of the MaxTV glasses she is able to do so. She also is an avid participant in one of the agency's ongoing support groups.

-Consumer #2 now feels much safer and independent in her residence and out in the community because of the CTSR provided O and M training program. She has stated that she now feels confident in her ability to navigate across streets without assistance.

-Consumers #3 and #4 are both legally blind but are now able to walk their dogs through the community because of the provision of the Ray Ban Meta Glasses which they received as the result of this grant.

3. CFI: CFI’s OIB program continues to significantly improve the safety, independence, and quality of life of older adults experiencing vision loss throughout the Western Slope. Through individualized skills training, access to assistive technology, peer support, and low-vision services, consumers are able to maintain independence in their homes, remain active in their communities, and preserve their personal autonomy.

The program’s impact is evidenced by the increased confidence and self-reliance reported by participants who receive one-on-one instruction in daily living skills, orientation and mobility, communication tools, and home adaptations. Many consumers express that they feel less isolated after participating in peer support groups and community engagement activities, which help normalize their experience of vision loss and provide emotional reassurance through shared lived experience.

Access to low-vision evaluations, device loans, and assistive technology training has empowered consumers to read their mail, manage medications, prepare meals safely, and use smart devices to stay connected with loved ones—often preventing premature placement into assisted living. Collaborative partnerships with low-vision specialists and community agencies strengthen the program’s reach and ensure that individuals receive comprehensive, coordinated support.
Overall, the OIB program has enabled older adults with vision loss to remain independent in their homes, reduce social isolation, increase community participation, and enhance their overall well-being.

Consumer Story: (names have been changed)
Sharla began losing her vision 21 years ago, her vision decreased until she had no functional vision left. She did not receive any blind or low vision services at any time during those 21 years. Sharla said she learned how to be blind by watching Laura Ingles on Little house on the Prairie. The morning after the Low Vision Resource Fair at CFI, there was a piece on the morning news about the event which included an interview with the Low Vision program manager at CFI. Sharla said because of the woman’s accent she spun around from what she was doing and listened carefully. The following day she called CFI and spoke with the Low Vision program manager. Although at that time she was only 54 and not eligible for OIB services, she was eligible for independent living services from CFI. Sharla got services from the CFI vocational staff who helped her open a case with DVR. An enormous change for Sharla was to finally be trained to use a white cane. She had never before been able to walk around her own back yard independently without someone guiding her. Her world was now greatly expanded. Sharla now attends the Western Slope peer support and participates in events such as the Glidance Demo Day & Knights of the Blind Walk. She is looking forward to finishing her training with DVR and hopes to start working in the Spring of 2026.

4. CPWD: A 98-year-old consumer who has worked with CPWD for 5+ months has very limited vision due to a diagnosis of macular degeneration (MD) a few years ago. He is an iOS user and is extremely bright. He was a dentist for many years and has always enjoyed reading and completing tasks independently.

When we first met, he said that Siri “isn’t my friend,” and he shared his concerns about his limitations in using this accessibility feature. During our initial assessment, he reported that his caregivers read his mail and retrieved his voicemails and emails. We asked him if he wanted to do these things himself, and he said, “I’m not really sure that’s a possibility, but if it is, I’d like to try.”

Over the past several months, this consumer has been meeting with CPWD for training on his iPhone. He is now texting me regularly, retrieving his own emails and voicemails, and has started exploring “what else Siri can help me with.” On a regular basis, he attends our training sessions and asks if we are aware of the tasks Siri can accomplish, many of which he is figuring out on his own. He is utilizing his device independently and confidently.

This consumer is now planning to join our next scheduled meeting remotely using his newly developed skills. Recently, he said, “I had no clue that all of this could be attainable for me. I feel accomplished as opposed to frustrated.”

One of our most inspiring moments came during our early voting event at the Boulder office, where we supported a dedicated participant from the Beyond Vision Program. This individual, who has been actively involved in our community, was featured in a local interview highlighting their voting experience as a person with vision loss. With support from our team, they were able to navigate the voting process independently using accessible voting tools and assistance from trained staff. Their story demonstrated the importance of accessibility in civic engagement and the impact of our program in empowering individuals to exercise their rights. The participant’s pride in casting their ballot was evident and serves as a powerful reminder of the role we play in promoting independence and inclusion in all aspects of life.

A 77-year-old Boulder County participant, who is navigating both vision loss from Macular Degeneration and hearing loss, has been an active member of one of our peer support groups. She shared the challenges of adapting to dual sensory loss, expressing feelings of isolation and frustration, and her loss of confidence to use technology and function in daily life.

We introduced simple but meaningful adaptations to enhance her daily life, such as using dark-colored towels for better contrast and adding “puffy paint” markers to her playing cards, an adjustment she described as “a game changer” for family game nights. Recognizing her desire to stay connected, we also provided training on using Siri for texting and calling, helping her communicate more easily with loved ones.

Most recently, she wanted to join the Low Vision/Hard of Hearing (LV/HH) remote group but struggled to hear the conversation. Determined to help her participate fully, we created a customized “Contact Card” with the group’s phone number and PIN pre-entered, allowing her to join seamlessly by simply asking Siri to call in. When she successfully connected, she beamed with pride, exclaiming, “I can’t believe I did this!” She later shared that our patience and support made all the difference, as we reminded her that she was the one who took the steps to make it happen.

Her journey is a powerful example of persistence, adaptation, and the strength of community. We are honored to be part of her continued success.

A Beyond Vision participant who has been engaged with the program for more than four years has made significant strides in independence this year. After losing their vision due to a brain tumor and spending ten years unaware of available services, they have set multiple goals in areas such as social and community participation, assistive technology training, and orientation and mobility.

They have joined several peer groups, including low vision, low vision and hard of hearing, and assistive technology groups. During this time, they also started a low vision and blind consumer book club, explored SSP (Support Service Provider) services, and attended workshops on Meta Smart Glasses. They were also trained in white cane techniques. They purchased a pair of Meta Smart Glasses and, with two friends who are also blind, used the device to navigate the zoo, read signs via AI, and receive descriptions of exhibits and animals. This experience highlights their significantly increased independence through training in orientation and mobility and assistive technology. It has increased their engagement in social and community activities, and their commitment to learning and applying assistive technology in daily life.

This consumer continues to set new goals, including joining the fall session of the 1-Touch Self Defense Course with SSP support, and mastering calendar management using JAWS. They have also participated in social activities such as Top Golf with friends and family, with an SSP providing environmental descriptions, and “Blind Sailing,” learning the basics of sailing while connecting with others in the low vision and blind community.

5. Ensight: The OIB program continues to have a profound effect on the independence and quality of life of older adults experiencing vision loss.

A 76-year-old consumer with macular degeneration learned to use adaptive lighting and magnification devices to read medication labels and manage her medication safely. As a result, she was able to remain living independently in her own home without requiring daily assistance from her daughter and neighbor.

Another consumer, a retired software engineer experiencing vision loss from glaucoma, received training in accessibility features on her tablet. She now uses video calling and reading apps to stay connected with family, reducing isolation and improving mental health. With all her education and background, she was stuck in the world of declining vision and couldn’t navigate these functions without frustration and annoyance. Sending someone in to work with her until she was comfortable was key. Sadly, assistive tech is hard for us to manage at the level needed and we are planning to build this program to a high volume soon!
1. CCB: CCB is committed to identifying individuals who are in need of services in our OIB community. In the past year, we held a resource fair at the Center and invited over 100 individuals to attend. We were pleased with the outcome and plan to hold another fair in February. We collaborate with other centers around the state. We sent information out on our program to ophthalmologists and others. We worked with several assistive living facilities to promote our program. We will continue these outreach efforts and plan to do even more in the next year.

As a result of our outreach efforts to professionals, we have had an increase of information and referral calls. Each week we provide information and referrals to approximately 12 individuals who are blind seniors or family members. We assist OIB students to receive services through the Talking Book Library, iCanConnect, Newsline for the Blind, and Access-a-Ride through RTD. We held our Empower Resource Fair in January and had over 60 participants. We exhibited in Castle Rock, Littleton, and Denver. We worked with Innovage to acquire new referrals and provide them with information. We met with several employees at the Bemis Public Library as they provide services to older individuals. We attended a resource fair in Greeley and have two individuals who will participate in our Taking Charge Program.

2. CTSR: In order to ensure that the broader community is informed of these services the agency participates in a number of regularly scheduled outreach events. This included (during this reporting period) 4 events sponsored by the Senior Connection (2 in Pueblo, 1 in Canon City and 1 in La Junta), 2 major outreach events in the San Luis Valley (May-Summerfest on the River, September-SLV Potato Festival) and one Senior Resource event in Trinidad. Through these outreaches the agency obtained a number of stakeholder contacts as well as helping to generate initial contact with new consumers (14 in all during this reporting period).

3. CFI: CFI’s community awareness, outreach, and information and referral efforts continue to play a critical role in increasing public awareness of vision loss, expanding access to services, and reducing social isolation among older adults who are blind or have low vision. Information and referral services are provided to all community members regardless of location or income, connecting individuals and their families to resources such as ADA rights, white cane access, assistive technology, low-vision evaluations, and community support services.

A key focus of the year’s outreach efforts involved addressing barriers that prevent older adults from fully participating in their communities, particularly transportation, communication accessibility, and limited availability of materials in alternate formats. CFI’s 5th annual “White Cane on Main” event and participation in White Cane Awareness Week, held in partnership with the Lions Club, increased public understanding of white cane laws and accessibility. These events resulted in stronger partnerships with community organizations, increased volunteer engagement, and a rise in referrals for OIB services.

The agency expanded its community education presence by collaborating with healthcare providers to deliver evidence-based programs such as Stepping On, and by providing a two-hour lecture to the Colorado Mesa University Master of Science in Occupational Therapy program on vision impairment and rehabilitation strategies. These efforts positioned CFI as a regional expert and strengthened professional awareness and referral pathways.

CFI also continued collaboration with the City of Grand Junction to improve accessibility in public services, including website usability and transportation. Additional outreach events, such as a Glide Assistive Technology Demonstration Day, a Drum Circle, and a Musical Instrument Petting Zoo, generated meaningful engagement and outcomes for consumers. The Glide event resulted in increased regional access to emerging assistive technologies, participation from individuals across the Western Slope, and recruitment of a new program volunteer. The musical engagement events fostered social connection, supported emotional well-being, and inspired consumers to pursue new interests, including one consumer who began violin lessons as a result of attending.

These outreach activities directly reduced isolation for older adults with vision loss by connecting them to peers, services, and their community. They also increased public awareness of blindness, challenged misconceptions, and promoted inclusion. Overall, CFI’s community awareness and information and referral initiatives led to increased service engagement, strengthened community partnerships, and improved access to resources for older adults who are blind or have low vision.

4. CPWD: CPWD conducted outreach efforts for under- and un-served populations, focusing on older adults with vision impairments in rural areas. Outreach activities included:
-Community presentations – solo and with collaborating organizations – at senior centers, libraries, and community hubs.
-Participating in health fairs and resource events to increase awareness about our services and connect with potential consumers.
-Partnering with local entities, including county public health departments and disability advocacy organizations, to share information about the program.
-Continuing from the previous year, we built community partnerships to strengthen program sustainability and impact.

Our outreach messaging centers around the lived experience and feedback of our consumers. Their struggles and successes tend to most accurately reflect the needs and goals of others yet to find services. Many of our successful consumers provide word-of-mouth outreach as they discover new levels of independence after engaging in services or peer support.

We also work to strengthen relationships with local partners, engage consumers directly, and advocate for the needs of the Blind and low-vision communities. Beyond Vision promotes the program through community events, partnerships, and advocacy initiatives, addressing knowledge gaps and increasing awareness of available services.

In addition, we support consumers by connecting them to resources that meet their individual needs. This includes providing information on available services, offering guidance on how to access supports, and making referrals to trusted external partners in disability, health, and wellness. By prioritizing consumer experiences and recommendations, our outreach strengthens community relationships and helps more people discover and benefit from the Beyond Vision program.

Following are some specific outreach activities for FFY 2025:
Activity: Nederland Library staff invited Beyond Vision to participate in their resource fair. Outcome: Library staff learned about the Assistive Technology Library at our Boulder office. They later visited the Boulder office for an overview of technology for the Blind community, explored common assistive devices for reading and other services, practiced hands-on use, and asked questions. Library staff learned how to make appropriate referrals to support library patrons with vision loss.

Activity: The Beyond Vision Manager and Director of Public Policy and Advocacy led a training, Introduction to Assistive Technology for Individuals with Low Vision, for the Colorado ADA Forum.
Outcome: We successfully introduced assistive technology, CPWD services, and other resources to 72 participants.

Feel the Beat is a dance initiative designed to bring movement and dance to the Deaf and Hard of Hearing community, using a conductive dance floor and specialized classes that support individuals with disabilities. The program incorporates ASL, audio description, mobility supports, and customized dance instruction to meet participants’ needs.

Activity: The Beyond Vision team celebrated a new community partnership with Feel the Beat Dance Studio in Westminster by hosting an accessible dance class featuring audio-described instruction and services for individuals who are hard of hearing.
Outcome: Ten consumers participated in the adaptive dance class, experiencing an activity they previously thought was inaccessible to them. Instruction was descriptive and sighted guide was provided for those requesting it, as well and mobility assistance

Activity: CPWD’s Beyond Vision Manager and an Independent Living Skills Trainer attended the Adams County Aging Network to connect with consumers and local organizations serving older adults. They shared information about Beyond Vision and other CPWD services relevant to participants’ questions.
Outcome: During the event, they connected with several organizations, including:
Colorado Gerontological Society, Apollo Telecare, BrightStar Care, ACAN – Bonnie Ashton, MTM Transit, and AgeWise Colorado.

Beyond this event, the Beyond Vision team also presented at resource fairs hosted by the following partners: Colorado Center for the Blind, Eagle View Active Adult Center, and Nederland Library.

Activities: Present or host a booth to provide information and education about CPWD services, assistive technology, and other resources.
Outcome: Connecting with partners, new partners, prospective consumers, and indirect contacts such as doctors and family members.

Activity: CPWD, in collaboration with Dead Blind Action Team(DBAT), supported the launch of the 1-Touch Self-Defense program by covering the instructor’s fee and purchasing necessary equipment.
Outcome: To date, two classes have been held, attended by 10 participants along with support service providers(SSPs) Current classes are held in Thornton, and we have plans to bring classes to Boulder County.

Activity: CPWD, in collaboration with Boulder County Elections, hosted an Early Voting Event at the Boulder office.
Outcome: Fifty participants attended the event to learn about accessible voting. One of the most inspiring moments occurred when we supported a Beyond Vision participant who has been actively involved in our community. This individual was featured in a local interview highlighting their voting experience as a person with vision loss. With support from our team, they navigated the voting process independently using accessible tools and assistance from trained staff. Their experience demonstrates the importance of accessibility in civic engagement and the impact of our program in empowering individuals to exercise their rights. Their pride in casting a ballot serves as a powerful reminder of the role we play in promoting independence and inclusion.

Activity: In addition to direct outreach activities, CPWD’s Communications department has been featuring BV consumers through stories and videos. These are published on our blog (https://www.cpwd.org/blog-1) and on social media (https://www.facebook.com/CPWD1), and on our YouTube Channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMGgdDwfhzODToLnXJ9tsmA). We also feature these stories and videos in our monthly newsletter, which is shared with almost 2,500 subscribers.
Outcome: While it is hard to impossible to measure the impact of communications and marketing that go out through various channels to a wider audience, we have seen positive feedback and increased engagement on our channels. Direct engagement ranges from other professionals in the health and human service field, to professionals in the low-vision field, to consumers with any disability, to consumers or non-consumers with low-vision, and even family, friends and strangers. Our goal with this form of outreach is not to make direct contact with potential consumers, but rather to increase awareness of our services throughout a wider breadth of the community, and to feature some of the successes and benefits of our services. We anticipate that this will inspire some, lead to some referrals, and also increase name recognition of CPWD and our BV services, increasing awareness of and access to services for more individuals with visual impairment.

5. Ensight: Outreach in FFY 2025 focused on reaching underserved rural communities and building new referral networks. Staff conducted presentations at senior centers, libraries, and health fairs, and strengthened partnerships with eye care professionals, home health agencies, and veteran service organizations. Outreach materials were provided in large print and digital formats for accessibility. Outreach Activities and Outcomes:

-Exhibitor at Senior Resource Fair (Fort Collins/ Loveland/ Estes/ Longmont/ Lafayette/ Grand Junction/ Arvada/ Louisville/ Golden/ Aurora/ Fort Morgan/ Sterling): Connected with over 550 attendees and enrolled 12 new consumers for OIB services.
-Presentation at Colorado Libraries for the “Aging Well” Series: Established new referral relationships with the various offices on aging.
-Participation in Community Vision and Health Fair: Distributed accessible materials, signed up new consumers, and increased awareness among local healthcare providers.
-Collaboration with Almost Family Home Health: Created referral pathway for clients with low vision to receive rehabilitation services.

These efforts have strengthened community visibility, built referral pipelines, and expanded access to services.
1. CCB: This year our staff received training on brain injury, hearing loss, and counseling around adjustment. Staff attended the national Convention of the National Federation of the Blind and learned about initiatives for older blind around the country. As our instructors are blind, they utilize our volunteers to drive for them to and from home visits and support groups. Our staff members are part of transportation committees to increase services. The Colorado Center for the Blind works closely with All Health network as they provide training. We teamed up with Littleton Hospital for a Fall Prevention Seminar. They will work with us in the upcoming year as well. We also worked with Cycling without Age on two ventures where our students rode on trishaws. The Carson Nature Center provided everyone with a birding informational session. We traveled to the Wings Over the Rockies museum to show our OIB participants that they can gain information by touching exhibits. They enjoyed this a great deal. We will be holding a holiday party. We invite everyone that we work with in all of our groups and also invite service providers. One of our students will be teaching a crochet class, and one of our volunteers will teach a wood carving class next year. Getting blind people out and attending various activities is pivotal to their independence.

2. CTSR:
Collaboration: NFB Meeting
Results: Better understanding of national issues facing individuals with vision issues.
Collaboration: OIB Collaborative Meeting
Results: Interface with other agencies providing these services.
Collaboration: Eschenbach Webinar
Results: Better understanding of the low vision care products this company provides.
Collaboration: Blind Health Expo
Results: Contact with providers and vendors
Collaboration: NFB Monthly Meeting
Results: Better understanding of national issues facing individuals with vision issues
Collaboration: LV Tech Group
Results: Contact with providers of LV Assistive Technology
Collaboration: Senior Connection
Results: Contact with vendors and consumers
Collaboration: Phone for the Disabled
Results: Contact with corp. providing specific services for visually impaired
Collaboration: ATIA Demo Days
Results: Contact and training from vendors of assistive technology.
Collaboration: ATIA Demo Days
Results: Same as above
Collaboration: LV Tech Group
Results: Contact with providers of LV Assistive Technology
Collaboration: Eyedaptive
Results: Contact with Vendor for specialty Glasses
Collaboration: Met Ray Ban
Results: Contact with Vendor for speciality Glasses
Collaboration: OIB Hands On Webinar
Results: Training in services/supports for LV
Collaboration: OIB O and M training
Results: Better understanding of O and M facets
Collaboration: Webinar
Results: Training on assisting Blind/Low Vision Finding employment
Collaboration: Eye 2 Eye
Results: Peer support Training from OIB-TAC
Collaboration: Webinar
Results: Assistance in better understanding of mental health issues involved in vision loss.

3. CFI: Community awareness, outreach, and information and referral (I&R) activities funded through Title VII-Chapter 2 and supplemented by additional resources continue to play a central role in expanding awareness of the OIB program and increasing access to services for older adults with blindness and low vision. These activities aim to reduce barriers to community participation, promote safety and independence, and increase knowledge of available support among consumers, caregivers, families, and community partners.

CFI’s I&R services remain available to all community members seeking guidance, regardless of eligibility or location, and continue to attract a wide range of inquiries related to low vision services, assistive technology, ADA rights, orientation and mobility resources, and general support for individuals adjusting to vision loss. These ongoing efforts have strengthened community knowledge of OIB services and have connected older adults to appropriate supports more quickly.

During FFY 2025, CFI conducted multiple community outreach events that increased visibility of low-vision services and strengthened partnerships. The fifth annual “White Cane on Main” event, held in Grand Junction for White Cane Awareness Day, brought together individuals who are blind or low vision, families, community members, and partner organizations, increasing community understanding of cane travel and blindness etiquette. During White Cane Awareness Week, CFI partnered with the Lions Club for the Knights of the Blind Walk, which included educational booths, tactile learning stations, a white cane simulation for sighted attendees, and information from partner agencies. These events expanded public awareness of OIB services, fostered new referral sources, and led to an increase in requests for OIB support following the events.

CFI continued strengthening relationships with professional and academic partners to expand understanding of low-vision rehabilitation. The Low Vision Program Manager was invited to provide a two-hour guest lecture to Colorado Mesa University’s Master of Science in Occupational Therapy program to educate future professionals on vision impairment and rehabilitation strategies. This collaboration enhanced community provider capacity and increased referrals from occupational therapy students and faculty.

Throughout the year, CFI staff engaged with local government agencies to promote accessibility within the community, including ongoing collaboration with the City of Grand Junction to improve website accessibility and transportation accommodations for individuals with vision loss. Additional outreach activities, such as a Glide Demonstration Day featuring an emerging navigation device for individuals with vision loss, attracted participants from across the Western Slope. The event helped establish new community partners, including a volunteer who joined the Low Vision Program as a direct result of the event.

CFI also hosted inclusive community-building events such as a Drum Circle and a Musical Instrument Petting Zoo, both of which were well-received by low-vision consumers of all ages and resulted in increased peer engagement and self-advocacy. These events encouraged meaningful social participation, reduced isolation among older adults with vision loss, and inspired participants to explore new hobbies and skills that support personal well-being and independence.

Across all outreach and I&R activities, the agency observed increased awareness of OIB services, new referrals from community partners, greater engagement from older adults who are blind or low vision, and strengthened partnerships with organizations that serve seniors. These activities contributed to reducing social isolation, increasing access to information, and fostering a more inclusive and informed community environment for older adults living with vision loss.

4. CPWD: CPWD has focused on the following capacity-building activities within the Beyond Vision program:

Description: Consumers participating in peer support and other services, who transition from hopelessness to enthusiasm by learning skills and increasing independence, are coached to lead groups and make direct connections with other consumers.
Outcome: Currently one consumer is co-facilitating the Bingo peer group along with supporting team members with reminder calls. Reminder calls have shown to increase participation in groups. Another consumer co-facilitates the No Light Perception peer group with a staff member. Group outings are also co-facilitated with peer group leads such as a recent museum outing where BV consumers had the opportunity to provide feedback to museum staff on being accessible to the Blind community.

Description: Ongoing training for staff to enhance facilitation, advocacy, and service delivery skills, including the following:
-All About Voting Virtual Event with Colorado Cross Disability Coalition, CPWD and Colorado Disability Law
-Orientation and Mobility for People with Orthopedic Impairments, in an effort to understand how to better offer directions, human guide, and assistance to consumers.
-Second Sense presentation Meta Smart Glasses Workshop
-Understanding People with Dementia and Vision Loss with the NRTC
-Understanding the Impact of Brain Injury & Vision Loss with NRTC
--Real Time AI Assistance with Smart Glasses
Shopping with AI webinar and discussion group
-Echo Vision Smart Glasses Virtual Demo
-Fireside Chat: Digital Accessibility with Hard of Hearing & Legally Blind Experts w/ Blind Institute of Technology
Outcome: Improved service quality and program effectiveness, ensuring that staff have the skills and competency to meet evolving community needs, and are up to date on assistive technology developments.

5. Ensight: Ensight invested in capacity-building initiatives to strengthen staff skills and community partnerships, including:
-Staff Continuing Education: Participation in professional development workshops on adaptive technology and low vision rehabilitation techniques.
-Volunteer Engagement: Expansion of the Companion Program, pairing trained volunteers with clients for reading and community support.
-Collaboration with Local Agencies: Joint outreach and training events with home health providers, senior service organizations, and vision care professionals.
These efforts have increased Ensight’s ability to serve more consumers effectively and sustain the quality of OIB services across the region.
Certification
I agree to submit this form by electronic means. By signing this form electronically, I certify under penalty of perjury that my answers are correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal meaning and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature.
Name and Title of Authorized Certifying Official
Anna Hartzog
Administrator IV, Blind and Low Vision Services Unit
Yes
Mon, 01/12/2026 - 00:00
OMB Notice
OMB Control Number: 1820-0608, approved for use through 12/31/2022
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 6 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain or retain a benefit (Section 13 of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended). Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, toU.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4537or email ICDocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1820-0608. Note: Please do not return the completed form to this address.