U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

RSA-227 for FY-2025: Submission #53

Vermont
09/30/2025
General Information
Designated Agency Identification
Vermont Legal Aid, Inc.
264 N. Winooski Ave.
Burlington
VT
05401
https://www.vtlegalaid.org/
Operating Agency (if different from Designated Agency)
Additional Information
Kelli Kazmarski
Kelli Kazmarski
(802) 424-4705
kkazmarski@vtlegalaid.org
Part I. Non-case Services
A. Information and Referral Services (I&R)
10
5
0
0
0
10
25
B. Training Activities
2
140
Event 1: CAP conducted a webinar for HireAbility Vermont (VocRehab) To provide information about the legal issues addressed by other projects within Vermont Legal Aid, Inc.

Attendees: 90 At the time of presentation and additional views available through HAVT.

Participants: vocational counselors, support personnel, supervisors, and administrators. 

Event 2: CAP conducted a webinar for the Vt Family Network (VT PTI) entitled “Journey from School to Employment and Independent Living: How CAP Can Help” focusing on the transition requirements under IDEA and Pre-ETS Requirements under WIOA With discussion of the role of CAP in the transition planning process.

Attendees: 40 at the time of presentation and additional views on the VFN YouTube channel.

Participants: Parents, advocates, state and community partners, and service providers. 
C. Agency Outreach
See Part IV A, below, for further description of Outreach activities.
D. Information Disseminated To The Public By Your Agency
0
0
0
150
1
0
nothing entered in Part I D6
E. Information Disseminated About Your Agency By External Media Coverage
n/a
Part II. Individual Case Services
A. Individuals served
6
11
17
1
1
B. Problem areas
1
2
7
1
0
4
0
0
C. Intervention Strategies for closed cases
14
0
2
0
1
0
17
D. Reasons for closing individuals' case files
2
9
0
1
1
0
1
0
2
1
0
0
Nothing entered in part II D12
E. Results achieved for individuals
7
1
0
0
2
1
3
0
1
2
Decision reversed or compromise reached with agency.
Part III. Program Data
A. Age
2
0
3
10
2
17
B. Gender
9
8
0
0
17
C. Race/ethnicity of Individuals Served
0
0
0
0
0
16
1
0
D. Primary disabling condition of individuals served
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
7
17
E. Types of Individuals Served
2
0
14
0
0
1
Part IV. Systemic Activities and Litigation
A. Non-Litigation Systemic Activities
2
During FY25, Vermont's CAP experienced a period of transition, when our CAP representative of over 35 years retired. We have since added and trained a new CAP representative, who brings new vision and energy to the role, building off of the significant accomplishments of her predecessor. CAP again engaged in a wide variety of systemic activities, some multiple times, to reach different audiences in FY25. CAP attended several meetings of the HAVT SRC (State Rehab Council) including
quarterly Policies and Procedures Committee, Performance Review Committee, Advocacy Outreach and Education Committee and Steering Committee meetings. CAP also attended monthly and quarterly meetings of the Division for the Blind and Visually Impaired (DBVI).

NON-LITIGATION SYSTEMIC ISSUES ADDRESSED BY CAP THAT RESULTED IN THE CHANGE OF ONE OR MORE POLICY OR PRACTICE OF AN AGENCY:

1) HAVT Self-Employment Policy (Chapter 308)

Over the course of multiple years, CAP led an ad hoc group involving key representatives of HAVT that worked to update HAVT’s 2009 policy regarding self-employment. With the assistance of Griffin-Hamis Associates (GHA), a nationally recognized expert regarding self-employment and customized employment for people with disabilities, HAVT -

Revised the policy;

Developed general and intensive training modules for staff;

Created a program manager position to facilitate the implementation of the revised policy;

Developed resource manuals for staff and participants;

Recruited and selected counselors to participate in intensive training to act as regional resources regarding self-employment;

Defined a panel to review and approve self-employment proposals

Substantially increased funding guidelines for self-employment increased;

Approved several self-employment proposals; and

Presented the HAVT model at conferences.

In the 1st quarter of F’25, the review panel began reviewing and funding self-employment proposals. CAP will continue to monitor the implementation of the revised policy. During the 2nd and 3rd quarters of FY’25, CAP shared the Vermont policy and model with counterparts in other states, and HireAbility VT has spoken with over 14 states expressing interest in the model. Training for general and specialist counselors is underway with the Division of the Blind and Visually Impaired joining in the training and implementation of the model.

2) HAVT Transportation Policy

During the 1st quarter of FY’25, as Chair of the HAVT Policies and Procedures (P&P) Committee, CAP commented on HAVT Transportation policy. Revisions will be made and returned to the P&P committee in the coming quarter.

In the 2nd quarter, the committee approved the revised policy which was implemented following public comment. However, HAVT proposed further revisions to the policy in the 3rd quarter, specifically, removal of the spending guideline of $15,000 toward the costs of base vehicles for those who need adapted/modified vehicles to reach an employment outcome. CAP objected to the proposal as inconsistent with the existing policy setting a spending guideline of $5,000 toward purchase of unmodified vehicles. CAP asserted that proposed elimination violated WIOA regulations permitting purchase of vehicles as a covered service, including contributions toward base adapted vehicles. CAP further argued that setting an arbitrary limit on the nature and scope of services is an issue. See, 34 CFR §§ 361.5 (c) (56) (i) and 361.48 (b) (8). Finally, CAP recommended that the policy permit a spending guideline of $5,000 to the cost of the base vehicle contribution to ensure consistency with existing policy and in recognition of a significant loss of funding experienced by the agency. The proposed change was accepted by HAVT, but the committee disagreed and advocated keeping the spending guideline at $15,000 to which HAVT agreed.

OTHER NON-LITIGATION SYSTEMIC ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED BY CAP DURING THE FISCAL YEAR:

1) Inadequate Services for Vermonters with Mental Health Disabilities

Over multiple FYs, CAP has raised concerns with HireAbility VT (HAVT) about observed poor outcomes for and the unmet service needs of individuals with mental health diagnoses.

CAP was unable to work on this initiative in the 1st quarter of FY’25.

In the 2nd quarter of FY’25, CAP observed a trend where participants with diagnosed and undiagnosed mental health disabilities received notices terminating HAVT services based on asserted non-cooperation. The alleged non-cooperation consisted of behaviors that were easily tied to the nature and severity of these participants' disabilities, which did not support the finding of non-cooperation. Instead, the assertions supported the finding that the participant was not receiving the appropriate support and that the counselors needed additional training on how to work with participants with challenging behavior. In some instances, there was a question as to whether the true basis for the service determination was the belief that the participant was too disabled to benefit from services but because the procedural requirements for termination under this standard were more complicated, the agency was opting for the non-cooperation standard.

In the 3rd quarter of FY ’25, CAP resurrected its concerns with the PRC and the committee requested HAVT provide updated data for review. CAP also raised the issue in monthly meetings with the Field Services Manager and in the CAP/HAVT quarterly meeting with the Director, Deputy Director, and other central office administrators. It was acknowledged that inability to benefit was the more accurate basis for the decisions to terminate services and that the agency struggles with those who have undiagnosed/untreated mental illness and/or personality disorders. It was the agency’s belief that they had let cases not moving forward go on too long before acting which made the procedures under the unable to benefit criterion more complicated to implement.

The PRC continues its work on this issue

2) HAVT and Division for the Blind and Visually Impaired (DBVI) Confidentiality Policies and other Policy Review:

Over several years, CAP raised concern about HAVT’s and DBVI’s confidentiality policies, which are the same. Over those years, the policy has been discussed within the HAVT Policies and Procedures Committee and with the Director of DBVI. The primary concern is the lack of a participant's complaint procedure if a breach of confidentiality is alleged. No ultimate action was taken by either.

Both HAVT and DBVI follow HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) rules. Unlike other states, the Divisions are structurally organized under the VT Agency of Human Services (AHS). While the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) has issued guidance indicating that under WIOA these entities are not subject to HIPAA requirements. The guidance, however, gives each state the right to select whatever policy it deems appropriate. While there appears to be a complaint procedure under the AHS structure, that complaint procedure is not readily accessible to HAVT or DBVI counselors, program participants, or the public.
Throughout FY’24, this policy came up for discussion within the Policies and Procedures Committee, but ultimate action was delayed due to the unavailability of the HAVT Policy Director.

The discussion resumed in the 1st quarter of FY’25 with CAP making specific recommendations for change, including:

Revising the definition of “personally identifiable information,”

Adding a definition of “informed consent,”

Adding a section on breach of confidentiality including reference to the Agency of Human Services (AHS) complaint procedures;

Adding reference to the AHS (encryption) policy when disclosing information electronically, and

Revising the policy to require consultation with legal counsel before any testimony by staff or disclosure of records in legal proceedings.

The proposed revisions were reviewed and approved by the committee in the 3rd quarter of FY’25. It is expected that DBVI will adopt the revised confidentiality policy.

In the 3rd quarter of FY’25, CAP completed a review of all DBVI policies to ensure compliance with WIOA regulations. CAP noted the absence of policies regarding referral and application, and “informed choice.” CAP submitted proposed policies in these areas. There is also an inadequate policy regarding confidentiality and CAP proposed adoption of the new HAVT policy. Multiple policies contain specific funding limits and no procedural criteria for making exceptions to spending guidelines in violation of WIOA regulations and RSA guidance. CAP reviewed with the Director and staff the VT rulemaking procedural requirements, recommended restructuring of the policies and procedures manual making it sequential thus easier to follow and identified priorities for policy revision by the Division.

3) CAP Outreach

Due to limited resources, no formal outreach activities were conducted in the 1st and 2nd quarters of FY’25.

In the 3rd quarter of FY’25, CAP maintained an informational table at the annual conference for the Vermont Family Network (VFN) (VT-PTIC) attended by 197 parents, educators, service providers, agencies, and youth with disabilities. We distributed written information about –

How Can I Get the Most Out Working with HireAbility Vermont?

How Should I Prepare for a Meeting with My Counselor?

5 Tips for Self-Advocacy

Frequently Asked Questions About Pre-Employment Transition Services

ABLE Accounts: Are They for You?

Client Assistance Program (CAP) Brochures

4) DBVI VT Pathways to Partnership (VT-P2P) Grant:

The Division for the Blind and Visually Impaired (DBVI) received a 5-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA). The focus of the Disability Innovation Fund (DIF) grant is to improve services and attain successful outcomes for youth/student with disabilities through development of training and best practices that can be implemented in all VT high schools and tech programs.

The grant requires collaboration (developing partnerships) between agencies, schools, parents, consumers, and other advocacy groups, independent living centers, and others. CAP serves on the steering and leadership committees.

In the 1st quarter of FY 25, students were recruited to participate in the pilot and construction of a website was initiated. The committees continued to meet and at each leadership meeting youth are invited to present their perspectives. Subcommittees were established to focus on disability pride and self-advocacy, work-based learning, and training. DBVI also contracted with HireAbility VT to assist with in-school presence through their school-based pre-ETS transition counselors.

In the 2nd and 3rd quarters of FY’25, CAP participated in meetings of the P2P steering, leadership, and disability pride/self-advocacy committees. CAP also participated in a training event for HireAbility VT (HAVT) school-based transition counselors engaged in pre-ETS services for eligible students. Website construction was completed, and committees on work-based learning, professional development (training), disability pride/self-advocacy continue to meet.

In the coming school year, the pilot will be expanded to include 22 high schools across the state with an HAVT transition counselor assigned to each high school.

B. Litigation
0
0
0
CAP lacks adequate funding to engage in individual representation and non-litigation systemic advocacy and also conduct litigation activities. CAP has prioritized individual representation and non-litigation systemic advocacy as only the CAP director is an attorney.
If CAP identifies a client in need of litigation services, a referral is made to another project within Vermont Legal Aid or Legal Services Vermont, or to another part of the Protection and Advocacy System as appropriate.
Part V. Agency Information
A. Designated Agency
External-other nonprofit agency
Vermont Legal Aid, Inc.
No
n/a
B. Staff Employed
One full time paralegal advocate
One full time attorney who is also the CAP Director
Two full time support staff who alternate coverage for CAP admin needs.
Part VI. Case Examples
Case Examples
CASE 1:
This case involves a 43-year-old individual with ADHD, autism, and mental health disorders who was referred to CAP from an attorney colleague within the organization.
In the 1st quarter of FY25, the client began a full-time cashier position with a local department store. HAVT and the employment consultant helped the client obtain accommodations for her disability and added the support of a job coach to help the client learn the procedures in the position. CAP attended monthly team meetings where the client decided she wanted to finish her degree which HAVT supported. The IPE was revised to reflect this change, and the HAVT counselor and job coach began helping the client to explore which credits were transferable and what field of study the client wanted to pursue. They will continue to offer this assistance in the coming quarter. During the 2nd quarter of FY’25, HAVT continued to support the client with post-secondary education plans and enrollment. The client also continues to work for the department store without any complications.
In the 3rd quarter of FY 25, HAVT continued to support the client with enrollment in post-secondary education courses and the client attended meetings without CAP’s presence. With no issue requiring CAP continued involvement, the case was closed in the 3rd quarter of FY 25.

CASE 2:
This case involves a client with PTS who was receiving services from HAVT to complete post- secondary classes for which she requested initial tuition assistance from HAVT in the amount of $2500 with the expectation that she would cover the remaining $2500 tuition cost. She had exhausted all other funding resources. Throughout her studies, she found that she was unable to pay the other $2500 she needed for tuition, and she requested that additional amount of funding.

During her work with HAVT, she was assigned multiple counselors because of staff leaving their positions. The most recent counselor advised the client in writing, on more than one occasion, that she would receive additional tuition funds, but then the funds were not provided. Following a decision denying the funding request, the client requested an administrative review. The review affirmed the denial because the funds sought were “not in alignment with her IPE goal.” The prior counselor had failed to amend the IPE when the client changed her employment goal to align with the tuition assistance granted. Without the additional tuition, the client would not be able to continue her work towards an accounting degree. The client appealed the decision.

CAP conducted an extensive record review and determined compelling evidence that the client reasonably believed that HAVT had agreed to provide the additional tuition funding requested. Legal research, including a VT Supreme Court decision in an analogous case, supported a reversal of the denial. CAP advised the client to request withdrawal of the appeal without prejudice with the expectation that the case could be resolved without a hearing. CAP submitted a legal memorandum to the Deputy Director of HAVT requesting a reversal which was granted. The remaining tuition was paid, and the client is able to enroll in additional classes needed for her degree. Enrollment has been delayed because the client needed to attend to other issues. But regular meetings with a new counselor were initiated and continue with CAP support.

In the 3rd quarter of FY’25, the client requested additional tuition assistance for three courses necessary for a master’s degree in accounting. The request was denied based on a misunderstanding of the facts. CAP submitted a memo clarifying the facts, requesting reconsideration of the decision, and averting an appeal. A response is pending.

In the fourth quarter of FY25, additional tuition assistance in the amount of approx.$7000.00 was approved by the vocational counselor! CAP remains involved as support for the client while the agreement is processed, which is going well.

CASE 3:
This case involves a 55-year-old woman with PTS, anxiety, and depression as well as some physical health issues. She was employed in a high wage position working for a congressperson. When the representative lost the election, she became unemployed, which occurred at the beginning of the pandemic. At this same time, her parent died unexpectedly, and she moved to Vermont to handle her parent’s affairs and to assume ownership of the family home. Throughout the pandemic and the years after, she was unable to obtain and sustain employment resulting in repossession of her only vehicle and other financial stressors putting her at risk of homelessness. She contacted CAP for help getting funding from HAVT for a vehicle. and multiple other needs with which the client asserted HAVT was unwilling to help. The client further asserted that HAVT and other state agencies were discriminating against her. Accordingly, she had filed multiple complaints against each entity. The relationship between the client and these agencies was very strained and tenuous.

In the 1st quarter of FY25 CAP agreed to review the case record to determine the merit of her various claims and to decide on which issues it could represent. CAP determined that it could not help her with most of the issues for which she sought help. CAP did agree to help her obtain funding for the purchase of a used vehicle which was the primary barrier to employment for this client.

Review of the record established that HAVT had committed multiple procedural errors, and misapplied/misinterpreted the HAVT policy and federal regulations. It denied her access to the transportation necessary to reach her employment goal. These failures caused the client to lose one job and prevented her from accepting other jobs which required personal transportation to/from and during work duties. Based on the facts in the case record and misapplication of the applicable policy, CAP successfully argued that the client met all criteria for HAVT funding for a used vehicle to obtain and retain offered employment. HAVT authorized $5,000 then $7,000 towards the purchase of a car, as well as one month of car rental expenses so the client could continue working until she found a car to purchase.

In the 3rd quarter of FY’25, the client found a car that exceeded the authorized funding. CAP advocated for and obtained an additional $1200 for the purchase. Within 24 hours following the purchase, the car was undrivable, and the client returned it to the dealership requesting repair or replacement. HAVT was notified of the development and supported the client’s position. The dealership agreed to provide the client with a different car for the price already paid after it determined that repairs to the car purchased exceeded the value of the car. The client received another car from the dealer that proved to be much better than the other car. HAVT paid for registration, taxes, and maintenance services not initially agreed to. The client continued with her part-time employment but decided to seek full-time employment but was dissatisfied with the support from HAVT and terminated her relationship with HAVT. Following the termination of services with HAVT, the client contacted CAP to say that she accepted a full-time position with a local medical center at a salary of $63,000 annually plus benefits. Case closed.

CASE 4:
This client contacted the DLP due to having challenges at her place of employment. While originally thought to be an employment discrimination case, it was determined that this was a CAP case. CAP assisted the client by helping connect the client back to HireAbility VT. HAVT wanted the client to complete orientation, but upon investigation it was determined that the client did complete orientation. HAVT assigned an counselor without the client needing to redo orientation.

CASE 5:
Client is a 57-yr-old individual working on a self-employment plan. Client felt that HAVT would not work with him due to his use of AI for his business plan. Upon CAP Advocate connecting with HAVT, it became clear that HAVT was willing to work with the client but that the plan was not sufficient to meet the expectations of the program, following the published policies and procedures. Ultimately, client decided to forego self-employment and work with HAVT around a different type of employment goal.

CASE 6:
Client is a 78-year-old individual who was working on a self-employment plan with HireAbility VT. Client had a medical incident which lead to the client's inability to work with HireAbility VT for some period of time. By report, HAVT discussed closing the case with the client and following up with an email. Client was advised that HAVT did not follow policy to provide written notice of closure via a letter and that client could appeal. Client was also advised that alternatively, a quicker and simpler resolution would be for the client to request a new case out of an office that was closer in proximity to the client’s home. Client opted to request a new case. A new VR Counselor was assigned, who reviewed the case. Client wanted support with paying for their storage unit which was being used to support supplementary self-employment, but VR counselor reviewed that when a self-employment goal is for supplemental and not primary income, there is a limit on funds HAVT is authorized to spend, which had already been exceeded with previously payments to the client. Client has since decided to shift from a self-employment goal to an employment goal, and has completed a new IPE. Case remains open.
Certification
Reports are to be submitted to RSA within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report. Please be reminded that you can enter data directly into the RSA website via the internet. Information on transmittal of the form is found on pages 19 and 20 of the reporting instructions.
Name and Title of Authorized Certifying Official
I agree to submit this form by electronic means. By signing this form electronically, I certify under penalty of perjury that my answers are correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal meaning and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature.
Kelli Kazmarski
Disability Law Project Director, Vermont Legal Aid
Yes
2026-01-27
OMB Notice

OMB Control Number: 1820-0528, approved for use through 07/31/2023

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 16 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain or retain a benefit (Section 13 of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended). Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4537 or email ICDocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1820-0528. Note: Please do not return the completed form to this address.