U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

RSA-227 for FY-2025: Submission #28

Texas
09/30/2025
General Information
Designated Agency Identification
Disability Rights Texas
2222 W Braker Ln
Austin
TX
78758
512-454-4816
1-800-252-9108
Operating Agency (if different from Designated Agency)
Additional Information
Jerold Terry
Jerold Terry
512-407-2796
jterry@disabilityrightstx.org
Part I. Non-case Services
A. Information and Referral Services (I&R)
89
1
0
0
4
77
171
B. Training Activities
29
549
Topics covered: CAP provides information about the Client Assistance Program, the State Vocational Rehabilitation Services program, and the Independent Living Services program in our presentations. Additionally, we give an overview of the other programs that are provided through Disability Rights Texas (DRTx) so persons are aware of other available resources through DRTx that might assist them should other barriers be encountered. We also have presentations focused on Pre-Employment Services for youth who are, or will be, moving from school to adulthood. We have delivered training to self-advocacy groups to help individuals develop self-advocacy skills and have presentations to help educate individuals on how to access services and to obtain and maintain independent living and employment. Lastly, CAP provided presentations to rehabilitation professionals to enhance their understanding of the Client Assistance Program, and to educate them on what other Disability Rights Texas services and resources are available to help their clients be successful.

Purpose of the Training: The goal of CAP training presentations is to provide information about the vocational rehabilitation services program, independent living services program, and the CAP program to individuals seeking vocational services and employment. The training includes an overview of the services, how the programs work, and contact information for those who can initiate services, as well as contact information for those who can help if there are concerns. With the information that is provided, individuals will be informed of available resources and of ways that services may be accessed.

Description of Attendees: Attendees receiving CAP training include students/youth and their parents, vocational rehabilitation services professionals, other services-based community organizations, and consumer groups. These efforts were conducted/facilitated as conference speakers/presenters, through specific team training to audiences in school districts, nonprofit organizations, vocational rehabilitation offices, also taking every opportunity to share information with individuals and entities serving beneficiaries of Social Security as clients, patients, teachers, families of beneficiaries, youth in foster care, and to the beneficiaries themselves
C. Agency Outreach
The CAP program coordinates outreach efforts and requests for outreach through our Disability Rights Texas Outreach Team. The focus of our outreach is to communicate, educate, and illustrate services available through CAP and DRTx, vocational rehabilitation services, and through independent living services. Our target audience is current CAP clients, potential clients, and regional Texas Workforce Solutions-Vocational Rehabilitation Services (TWS-VRS) staff and staff of Independent Living Centers. We work with other DRTx teams to leverage our outreach efforts throughout the State. We seek out opportunities to engage with families, individuals, community services organizations, legal aid organizations, State agencies, and associations who serve individuals with disabilities.

The Disability Rights Texas (DRTx) website provides interested parties and individuals with disabilities a myriad of pertinent information and e-links, education and training sessions and materials (both virtually and in-person), as well as in alternate formats, and provision of interpreters. We have an active website link, specific to the Client Assistance Program in Texas which, during this reporting period, received 2,212 total views (2,101 views in English; 21 views in Spanish. DRTx also has active social media pages, including Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
D. Information Disseminated To The Public By Your Agency
0
0
0
44
11
0
N/A
E. Information Disseminated About Your Agency By External Media Coverage
N/A
Part II. Individual Case Services
A. Individuals served
155
239
394
16
116
B. Problem areas
5
75
124
82
0
119
3
0
C. Intervention Strategies for closed cases
16
152
117
1
1
0
295
D. Reasons for closing individuals' case files
182
26
15
7
2
36
4
0
21
2
0
0
N/A
E. Results achieved for individuals
60
10
6
0
134
39
22
16
8
0
N/A
Part III. Program Data
A. Age
30
71
111
159
23
394
B. Gender
201
192
0
1
394
C. Race/ethnicity of Individuals Served
81
7
13
115
0
163
11
4
D. Primary disabling condition of individuals served
5
48
0
4
1
9
51
6
32
17
2
6
14
11
8
10
3
3
1
29
64
3
3
13
19
14
1
3
0
8
2
4
0
0
394
E. Types of Individuals Served
107
4
272
5
8
2
Part IV. Systemic Activities and Litigation
A. Non-Litigation Systemic Activities
4
2) Systemic Issues/Resolution:

a) Texas Workforce Commission embarked on a project of reviewing and rewriting much of the entire TWC-Vocational Rehabilitation Services Standards Manual (VRSM). We/CAP read the entire new 950-page manual, and provided feedback and comment to the agency (TWC-VRS). They accepted some of the CAP recommended changes, to include the following:

• In the VRSM Part B, chapter 2.3 Informed Choice; B. Customer Decision-Making, page 180, CAP recommended that Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) staff should mention the Client Assistance Program at the time of application, IPE, and anytime services are reduced, suspended, or terminated, and if there is a denial of services. VR responded that CAP is included in the “Can We Talk?” brochure but they would add the recommended information into the VR phases identified by CAP.

• In Part B, Chapter 4, Eligibility Determination; Procedures; Assessment for Determining Disability, page 197, VR indicated that case closure would occur if an extension of time was not signed and 60-days had passed without contact being made with the client. CAP informed VR that CAP had seen several cases where the case was closed without notice because the extension of time was not agreed to. CAP pointed out that this was an opportunity to provide CAP contact information to a client as per 34 CFR part 270. VR agreed to add the recommended information.

• In Part B, Chapter 8: IPE Policy, page 222, CAP pointed out that the verbiage added by VR made the need for amending an IPE unclear. VR agreed to remove the word “substantive” to make the process/necessity of IPE amendment clearer. The word “substantive” was used in other areas of the rewrite of the VRSM. VR agreed to remove that word from the other areas as well.

• In Part B, Chapter 9, Computerized Criminal History (CCH), VR indicated that the VR client is required to pay the service fee at the time of a fingerprinting appointment. CAP recommended changing the verbiage to include those clients who are under the standard Basic Living Requirement (BLR) and/or SSI/SSDI beneficiaries will have their fees paid by the agency via a maintenance check.

• In Part B, Chapter 6: Trial Work Experience (TWE) procedures; Comparable Services and Benefits, VR was not clear in what counselors should do when a client was in a trial work experience. The client had not yet been determined eligible for VR services and had not discussed how comparable benefits would be utilized. CAP asked that VR change the verbiage to add “…and have an IPE” so that counselors (and clients) know that comparable benefits are to be considered for individuals who are, both, eligible and have an IPE.

b) CAP discussed IPE signatures, as well as all VR signatures, in general. CAP asked VR to change policy so that the integrity of the signature was intact. VR agreed, and the policy is now in place.
c) CAP addressed the issue of when a Ticket to Work/Employment Network automatic assignment to State VR with TWC-VR occurs. CAP received a number of inquiries concerned with automatic employment network selection and Ticket to Work activation. They reported there had been no discussion, education, nor information provided to them by their counselor. Through a number of meetings with the local VR management, the regional office, the TTW Program Manager, Social Security Administration, and the TWC-VR executive team worked and successfully negotiated a “work-around” for clients so that their Ticket would stay “unassigned”. For clarification, when a Social Security beneficiary’s Ticket to Work is activated and assigned, the recipient has a timeline (or clock) that begins to monitor successful progress, or not. Due to the numbers of individuals who had this concern, administrative complaints that were submitted to various entities. VR shares CAP’s concern and is seeking ways of addressing the issues through their electronic data system. One of the options they mentioned is adding a drop-down/check box on the electronic IPE document. They are also in consideration of changing verbiage and providing additional training efforts on how to process the workaround. CAP was successful in negotiating the workaround, and continued possibility of a more efficient approach.
d) While TWC-VRS was able to receive additional funding through Statewide reallotments, CAP remained concerned with allocations and allotments and continued to monitor and approach VR leadership with requests for updates throughout the legislative budget discussions and processes. CAP’s initial intervention, communication, and ongoing monitoring positively impacted VR clients in receiving services and, with ongoing interaction and focus. The additional reallotments helped TWC-VRS avoid going in to an order of selection.

B. Litigation
0
0
0
There were no cases involved in systemic litigation during the year.
Part V. Agency Information
A. Designated Agency
External-Protection and Advocacy agency
Disability Rights Texas
No
B. Staff Employed
Position FTE % of year person-years
Professional full time 10.16 FTE
Professional part-time 0 FTE
Professional vacant 1 FTE

Clerical full time 0.39 FTE
Clerical part-time 0 FTE
Clerical vacant 0 FTE
Part VI. Case Examples
Case Examples
VI. Case Examples:

PROFESSIONAL LICENSURE/MULTIPLE DISABILITIES/DELAYS IN SERVICE:

GG is a 62-year-old female, with a reported history of Retinitis Pigmentosa, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Fibromyalgia, Spondylosis(spine), Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Major Depression, and Complex PTSD. Client requested assistance from CAP due to the delays in her VR services. She was seeking support to obtain her LPC-A counseling license. CAP attended meetings with the client and her assigned Texas Workforce Services-Vocational Rehabilitation Services (TWS-VRS) counselor, along with meetings with the unit support coordinator, manager, and the program management specialist at the VR Division, all in an effort to advocate for the approval of services that had been delayed. CAP facilitated the amendment to the Individualized Plan for Employment (IPE) to include services to support the client with prescription medication and nutrition services. CAP was also instrumental in successfully advocating for assistive technology-training, a sleep study, an assessment of her home work space, and job skills training related to ADHD coaching to help client with completing the LPC-A supervision hours. CAP successfully concluded the case once all VR service authorizations were issued.

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND DELAY IN EVALUATION:

MK is an 18-year-old male who has been diagnosed with bilateral retinoblastoma at eight months old and is legally blind in his left eye. Upon contacting DRTx, client had an open case with TWS-VRS. Client contacted DRTx because he had been requesting assistance with an assistive technology evaluation since the summer of 2024 without success. CAP accepted the case, providing advocacy services to amend client’s IPE to include the long-awaited evaluation, as well as assistance with the purchase of the assistive technology that was recommended by the AT evaluation.

With CAP’s help, the client’s IPE was amended to include counseling and guidance, all recommend assistive technology items, including the following: an Optaro iPhone Video Magnifier and Optaro case for iPhone 13, a Dell Latitude 5540 laptop with a surge protector and Zoom Text. In addition, with CAP’s prompting, the client’s IPE was amended to also include VR funding and support for tuition, books, supplies, and room and board fees while the client attends out-of-state college at Henderson State University in Arkansas.

SELF-EMPLOYMENT DELAYS:

LB is a 53-year-old female, with a hearing impairment, nerve damage, autoimmune disorder, Crohn disease, and lupus. The client sought CAP services to help her secure VR services in order to obtain a canine trainer certification, which she was seeking as part of her self-employment plan to work as a service dog trainer. Her VR case had come to a halt. During the investigation of the case, CAP learned that the VRC had unsuccessfully attempted to link three training entities as a TWS-VRS payee/vendor.

CAP successfully negotiated to have VR issue funds for tuition to the client via maintenance check so that the client could pay directly to the training entity. The request was approved at field office and regional levels, but later rescinded and the client was notified that she must complete a functional capacity evaluation (FCE) and business plan first. CAP conducted calls and meetings with TWS-VRS supervisory staff and received reconsideration, which stated that, in lieu of the FCE, the client could submit a work restriction checklist from her physician and, if approved for training, she would not be required to complete the business plan before pursuing training. CAP successfully facilitated the submission of the work restriction checklist and monitored the case until an approval for tuition maintenance was received at the field and regional levels again. CAP corresponded with regional level staff to monitor the approval process to state level and, when the process stalled, CAP contacted the VR Director which resulted in an approval. CAP participated in the IPE amendment meeting to reflect the agreement and monitored the case to ensure the client was established as a payee, so she could receive the check directly. ,

BARIATRIC SURGERY:

AP is a 47-year-old Female with Diabetes, Heart/Circulatory Conditions, and Orthopedic/Physical Impairments. The client reached out to DRTx and CAP with concerns over delays with scheduling a bariatric surgery that TWS-VRS had agreed to support, as a part of her IPE. Even with CAP’s intervention and negotiation, this case took an extended time due to a number of factors that included a change in VRC, a change in surgeon, and expired assessments and tests needed by the client’s doctors that had to be redone. CAP attended meetings with the client and her VRC, requested frequent updates from TWS-VRS, and kept the process moving, providing guidance to the client throughout the process. The client’s surgery was completed successfully.


VEHICLE MODIFICATION/DELAYS IN SERVICE/INCONSISTENT COMMUNICATION:

KU is a 20-year-old female. She had a stroke/brain aneurysm when she was 18 years old. She was in college at the time, and working two part-time jobs. KU reached out to DRTx/CAP with a request to change counselors, due to conflicting communication from VRC regarding vehicle modification services. KU had started the vehicle modification process a year prior. KU and her family had the belief that TWS-VRS would be able to help her with a down payment and six months of payments for a vehicle. CAP Advocate investigated KU’s concerns, which included talking with TWS-VRS and reviewing TWS-VRS records. During the investigation, the TWS-VRS Counselor (VRC) agreed that she wanted to help KU. During the year, there were some missteps, as the family did not have information from TWS-VRS about approved vehicles. The family exchanged vehicles, which added an additional expense/hardship to the family. During the CAP investigation, KU and her family wrote a letter of hardship, and presented the information to TWS-VRS. The request was approved, and KU received the much-needed financial assistance, vehicle modification, and follow-up drivers’ training.

CAP agreed to facilitate communication with TWS-VRS, and transfer of counselor to someone who had more experience, as the assigned VRC did not know KU very well, and was primarily focused on job placement assistance. Advocate provided the VRC information about KU’s long-term goals, which included returning to college. This information helped the VRC prepare for meetings with KU. With CAP’s help, KU’s Individualized Plan for Employment (IPE) was amended to include additional substantial services, including: tuition, fees, books, supplies, Assistive Technology assessment, vocational assessment, a computer, and benefits counseling. Because the VRC was amenable to KU’s unique goals, interests, and capabilities, KU decided to continue working with the assigned VRC.
Vehicle modification is a complex service that occurs in several phases and requires input from other VR staff, including the Assistive Technology Specialist (ATS) and the Program Specialist for Assistive and Rehab Technology (PSART). The ATS in this case was very resourceful, and provided in-depth information during the steps.

DEAFNESS, COMMUNICATION ISSUE W/VRC REQUIRING COUNSELOR CHANGE AND POLICY TRAINING FOR VRC:

CC is a 29-year-old female who is Deaf. She uses ASL to communicate. CC experienced communication barriers with her TWS-VRS Counselor (VRC), who works with a specialized Deaf and Hard of Hearing case load, but he does not use ASL. CAP investigated CC’s concerns, which included talking with the assigned VRC and reviewing TWS-VRS records. The VRC characterized CC as having high expectations and requiring a significant level of support. The VRC also emphasized his own capacity to deliver exemplary vocational rehabilitation services tailored to meet customer’s demands. CAP determined that, while the VRC determined eligibility for services prior to the 60-day requirement and prepared a plan of services to help CC find employment, documentation regarding communication seemed to trail off after that. Of note, the VRC determined presumptive eligibility based on CC’s receipt of Social Security benefits, however, CC had not received disability benefits for several years.

Unfortunately, the VRC did not keep records of text messages with CC to verify the scope and quality of services/communication. There was also miscommunication that CC did not pass a background check at work, as the job loss seemed to relate to issues regarding interpreter services purchased by TWS-VRS. VRC also noted that employment with a former job placement provider affected CC’s employment, but there was no documentation.

At the client’s request, CAP agreed to facilitate a change of counselor to a VRC who uses ASL as their primary means of communication. This was accomplished expeditiously. CC met with her new VRC, and chose to work with a job placement provider who also uses ASL. CAP shared with CC and TWS-VRS how she could convey communication about her experience with the interpreter services (internal TWC form). CAP provided the transferring VRC and his supervisor with the policy regarding maintaining documentation and encouraged VRC to keep accurate records in the case file. CAP received assurance from the supervisor that TWS-VRS will receive training.

TRAINING/DENIAL OF RENT PAYMENT:

KP is a 24-year-old female, with the reported history of Bilateral Madelung’s deformity which cause deformities in the hands, wrist, and arms. Client reported issues with TWS-VRS not paying her rent and she was being evicted because of it. She was being financially sponsored by VR in a teacher certification program and was needing to complete her field observation to finish the program. The fear, and real possibility, of eviction was going to significantly impact her success. She stated she had attempted to call the VR Counselor, VR Supervisor, and VR Manager, without response.

CAP agreed to schedule and attend meetings with client and the assigned TWS-VRS counselor to advocate for the training and support, previously requested to maintain her current employment with Crowley Independent School District CAP helped find and negotiate an additional three months of temporary housing while she completed her semester. With CAP’s help, the client and the TWS-VRS counselor amended the Individualized Plan for Employment (IPE), to include all requested services, including approval of the additional three months of temporary housing.

Certification
Reports are to be submitted to RSA within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report. Please be reminded that you can enter data directly into the RSA website via the internet. Information on transmittal of the form is found on pages 19 and 20 of the reporting instructions.
Name and Title of Authorized Certifying Official
I agree to submit this form by electronic means. By signing this form electronically, I certify under penalty of perjury that my answers are correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal meaning and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature.
Sean Jackson
Executive Director
Yes
2025-12-19
OMB Notice

OMB Control Number: 1820-0528, approved for use through 07/31/2023

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 16 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain or retain a benefit (Section 13 of the Rehabilitation Act, as amended). Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4537 or email ICDocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1820-0528. Note: Please do not return the completed form to this address.